SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 604

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.S. Nijjar and Ranjan Gogoi, JJ.
SHIV NANDAN MAHTO - Appellant;
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS - Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 5306 of 2013
Decided on : July 8, 2013

Advocates Appeared:
Dinesh Chandra Pandey, Advocate, for the Appellant;
Chandan Kumar (for Gopal Singh), Advocate, for the Respondents.

IMPORTANT POINT
If an employee is kept out of employment illegally, he will be entitled for full back wages.

Headnote:Service Law – Back wages – Appellant kept out of service by mistake of the authorities and not his own fault – He could not have been denied back wages on principle of ‘no work no pay’ for the period he was kept out of service illegally. (Para 5)

       Facts of the case:

       Appellant was a clerk in a school. At the taking over, in the inspection report, he was wrongly shown as ‘librarian’. Therefore although the school was taken over services of the appellant were not taken over because there was no sanctioned post of librarian in the school.

       Appellant made a representation which was accepted but he could not be posted anywhere because no post of clerk was vacant in any school.

       He kept tossing from office to office and school to school and did not get any salary from any source.

       The High Court allowed his writ petition but did not grant back wages.

       Finding of the Court:

       Having been kept of employment illegally, appellant is entitled to full back wages.

       

ORDER

1. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. The Appellant was appointed against a permanent post of Clerk in the Raj Kishore Balika High School; Narhan, Samastipur, Bihar on 31.12.1978. He joined on the said post on 1.1.1979. Subsequently, the aforesaid school was granted permission by the Directorate of Secondary Education vide office memo No. 31346 dated 19.11.1981 for establishment of the aforesaid school. The school was inspected by the special Board on 6.8.1982. In the inspection report, the name of the Appellant was inadvertently/wrongly shown as a Librarian. On coming to know of the aforesaid wrong entry, the Appellant submitted a representation before the Directorate of Secondary Education seeking correction thereof. On 1.5.1983, the inspection committee submitted its report and confirmed that the Appellant had been working as a clerk since the very beginning in the aforesaid school. The school was taken over by the Government of Bihar on 2.8.1983 in terms of the provisions of Section 3 of the Bihar Non-Government Secondary Schools (Taking Over of Management and Control) Act, 1981. The services of the Appellant were not taken over, as his name was wrongly shown against the post of Librarian, which post was not approved. Aggrieved by the action of the Respondent, the Appellant submitted a representation before the Director, Secondary Education, Patna on 17.11.1983 and the Director issued directions to adjust the Appellant against the post of Clerk in a school in the aforesaid District. On 3.2.1984, the Director, Secondary Education, Patna directed the posting of the Appellant as Clerk in the High School, Virhan, Madhubani upon transfer of another teacher. However, it later transpires that there was no vacancy on the post of Clerk in the District. Therefore, directions were issued to adjust the Appellant as and when vacancy is available. Since there was no post of Clerk in the High School Virhan, Madhubani, the Appellant was made to join the office of the District Education Officer, Virhan with effect from 3.3.1984 and allotted duties and work in the aforesaid office. Subsequently, directions were issued to post the Appellant as a Clerk in a different school. It appears that due to lack of vacancy, the Appellant was not posted in any school for some time. The Appellant again protested to the Director for not being given posting orders on the post of Clerk. It appears that the Appellant was made a rolling stone for long period of time being shunted from school to school in an effort to locate a vacancy for him. In the meantime, the Appellant had not received any salary from any source. Ultimately, the Appellant moved the High Court by way of Civil Writ Petition No. 516 of 1990 with a prayer seeking reinstatement and consequential benefits.

4. The learned single Judge of the High Court, upon noticing the entire fact situation, accepted the plea of the Appellant that he had been duly appointed as Clerk and wrongly shown as a Librarian. Consequently, directions were issued to reinstate the Appellant forthwith. It was also noticed that the removal of the Appellant from service was not for any fault of his. He was also directed to be given the benefit of continuity of service and other benefits. However, surprisingly, the learned single Judge directed that he will not be entitled to any remuneration for the period when he was not in service on the ground that he had not worked. The Respondent did not challenge the finding of fact recorded by the learned single Judge. In fact, it was the Appellant who challenged the judgment of the learned single Judge on the ground that he ought to have been granted full backwages for the period he had been kept out of service. The appeal was dismissed by the High Court in limine with the following observations:

Upon hearing learned Counsel for the Appellant, we dismiss this appeal for the reasons that it is settled law that no work no pay. Therefore, learned single



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top