G.S.SINGHVI, H.L.GOKHALE, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI
HUKAM CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted. Having failed to convince the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court to quash the acquisition of their land on the grounds of violation of Section 5A(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') and discrimination, the Appellants have preferred these appeals.
2. For the sake of convenience, the facts arc being noticed from the record of the appeal arising out of SLP(C) No. 20303 of 2011.
3. Appellant - Bohru is the co-owner in possession of land comprised in Khewat No. 89, Khata No. 111, Rectangle No. 16, Killa No. 14/2 (4-12) situated in village Fazilwas, Tehsil and District Gurgaon. He constructed thereon a building consisting of 6 rooms with an open verandah, shed and courtyard. After obtaining a licence from the Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, the Appellant started a flour mill under the name and style M/s. Dinesh Flour Mill.
4. By notification dated 14.12.2006 issued under Section 4(1) of the Act, the Government of Haryana proposed the acquisition of land situated in seven villages, including Fazilwas, for setting up Choudhary Devi Lal Industrial Model Township. The Appellant filed objections under Section 5A(1) of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.