SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 71

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Aftab Alam and Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, JJ.
B.G. VERGHESE - Petitioner;
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS - Respondents.
Writ Petitions (Crl.) No. 31 of 2007 with No. 83 of 2008,
Decided on : January 25, 2012

Headnote:Administration of Justice – Judicial Review – Alleged fake encounters in Gujarat – State constituting a Special task Force and a Monitoring Authority – Said Authority having ample powers and headed by former Judge of Supreme Court – Supreme Court expressing satisfaction on the development – Giving necessary directions for smooth and proper functioning of the Authority. (Para 8 to 13)

       Facts of the case:

       These two writ petitions allege fake police encounters in Gujarat.

       The writ petitioners made prayer for independent investigation into these killings.

       During pendency of these petitions Government of Gujarat constituted a Special Tak Force and a Monitoring Authority for the purpose.

       Monitoring Authority having ample powers is headed by a former Judge of the Supreme Court.

       Finding of the Court:

       Constitution of the Special task Force and the Monitoring Authority are steps in right direction.

       

ORDER

1. These are two connected writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution.

2. In Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 31 of 2007, it is stated that during the years 2003-2006, 21 police encounter killings took place in the State of Gujarat. A city-wise list giving the names and some basic informations in regard to the persons said to have been killed in police encounters is given in a tabular form which is enclosed as Annexure P-1 to the writ petition. It is alleged that the so-called police encounters were fake and those persons were killed by the police officials in cold blood.

3. A prayer is made to order an inquiry into all the cases of police encounters which, according to the Petitioner, were fake in order to establish the rule of law and to bring out the truth in each case. The other Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 83 of 2007 relates to the killing of Sameer Khan, once again, in a police encounter. The circumstances in which the encounter is said to have taken place are detailed in the writ petition and as in the connected case, it is alleged that this too was an instance of fake encounter in which the aforesaid Sameer Khan was killed by the officers of the Crime Branch of Police in cold blood and in a premeditated manner.

4. A prayer is made in this writ petition to order an independent investigation by a Special Investigation Team into all the fake encounters, including the one in which Sameer Khan was killed. It is further prayed that the same investigating team may also be directed to make inquiry "into the cover up of the killing of Sameer Khan".

5. During the pendency of this writ petition, the State of Gujarat has constituted a Monitoring Authority and Special Task Force for investigation of police encounters vide Notification dated September 16, 2010 published in the Gujarat Government Gazette Extraordinary dated September 18, 2010.

6. Clause three of the Notification deals with the powers and functions of the Monitoring Authority, which are as under:

3. Powers and Functions of the Monitoring Authority: The powers and functions of the Monitoring Authority shall be as under:

(1) The Monitoring Authority shall monitor the investigation into the encounter deaths and all other incidental and ancillary matters of the Special Task Force;

(2) The Monitoring Authority shall have the power to guide and instruct the Special Task Force with respect to any subject, aspect, question or issue in relation to the mode, method and direction with regard to or connected with the investigation of encounter death;

(3) The Monitoring Authority shall have the power and duty to receive complaints of any death alleged to be an encounter death from the relatives of the victim;

(4) The Monitoring Authority shall also have the power to receive inputs and suggestions from the relatives of such victims and also the complaints, if any, of the officers of the police force facing investigation and if such inputs/information/suggestion and/or complaint is related to, whether directly or incidentally, the encounter death, the Monitoring Authority shall direct the Special Task Force, to take them into consideration during investigation and report to the Monitoring Authority;

(5) It shall be the power and responsibility of the Monitoring Authority to review the progress of the investigation on quarterly basis and it shall be the corresponding duty of the Special Task Force to appraise, inform and brief the Monitoring Authority in detail at the regular interval of three weeks regarding the progress of the investigation in question;

(6) The non compliance with and deliberate disregard of the directions issued by the Monitoring Authority to the Special Task Force and/or any member thereof shall be construed as dereliction of duty and/or insubordination on the part of the Special Task Force and/or any of its constituents.

7. Following the Gazette Notification, an office order was issued on April 2, 2011, appointing certain police officers (named in the office order) a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top