SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 197

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Deepak Verma and K.S.P. Radhakrishnan, JJ.
GURDEEP SINGH - Appellant;
Versus
BHIM SINGH AND OTHERS - Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 2618 of 2012
Decided on : February 29, 2012

IMPORTANT POINT
In case of motor accident claim would be payable by the owner and driver if the Insurance Company is not liable.

Headnote:(a) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 149 – Claimant changing the registration no. of the bus during proceeding – Insurance Company disowning liability as the vehicle with changed registration no. was not insured by it – No infirmity. (Para 14, 15)

       (b) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 163 – Accident proved – Disability of claimant established – Owner and driver liable even if Insurance Company is not. (Para 16, 18, 20)

       Facts of the case:

       This is a case regarding compensation in motor accident.

       Finding of the Court:

       Appellant is entitled to compensation even if the Insurance Company is not liable. Compensation will be paid by the owner and the driver of the offending vehicle.

       

ORDER

1. Leave granted. Appellant was Claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar (hereinafter referred to as 'Claims Tribunal') in Claim Petition No. 134 of 20.2.1995/30.7.1997, claiming compensation against the Respondents on account of injuries said to have been suffered by him in a motor road accident that had taken place on the intervening night of 28th and 29th September, 1994, near Hansi.

2. According to Appellant, he was travelling in a bus bearing Registration No. DL-1-P-1521, belonging to Respondent No. 4 M/s Kataria Tours and Travellers, driven by Respondent No. 5. He was proceeding from Sri Ganganagar to Delhi in the said bus driven by Amar Singh. When the bus reached at some distance, ahead of Hansi at about 2.30 A.M., a bus of Haryana Roadways, driven by Respondent No. 1 Bhim Singh, was going ahead of the bus at high speed. The Driver of the bus in which the Appellant was travelling, was also driving the bus at high speed, in a rash and negligent manner. All passengers of the bus had requested the driver to drive it slowly and cautiously, but their requests were of no avail. The driver of Haryana Roadways applied the brakes all of a sudden probably with an intention to save an animal (Neel Gai) which was crossing the road at night. On account of it, there was a collision between the two buses.

3. In the said road accident, the Appellant suffered multiple grievous injuries. He was immediately taken to a nearby hospital for treatment and from where, he was referred to Kolmet Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Pusa Road, New Delhi for further treatment. Two-three operations were performed on the person of the Appellant on account of the multiple injuries said to have been suffered by him in the said road accident. According to him, he had already spent more than ` 2 lacs for his treatment.

4. He was, therefore, constrained to file a Claim Petition, as mentioned hereinabove, before the Claims Tribunal, claiming a total amount of ` 5 lacs from the Respondents for the pain, sufferings, treatment, loss of earning capacity and other such factors, jointly and severally. On notices being issued to Respondents, Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 were proceeded ex parte, the name of Respondent No. 4 was deleted and matter was contested by Respondents 1 to 3 and Respondent No. 7/the United India Insurance Company Ltd.

5. On consideration of the evidence available on record, the Claims Tribunal vide its Award dated 31.3.2001, came to the conclusion that no relief can be granted to the Appellant as he has not been able to prove that he was travelling in the bus which had actually met with the accident.

6. Initially in the Claim Petition filed by Appellant, he had mentioned that he was travelling in a bus bearing Registration No. DL-1-P-1521, but there was no accident of this bus. The accident was with a bus bearing Registration No. DL-1-P-1529. There appears to be some confusion with regard to the actual Registration number of the bus belonging to M/s Kataria Tours and Travellers.

7. In the evidence of RW-1 - Bhim Singh (Driver of the bus owned by Haryana Roadways), it has come on record that accident had actually occurred with the bus bearing Registration No. DL-1-P-1529 and there was no accident with bus bearing Registration No. DL-1-P-1521. Similar is the evidence of RW-2 - Suresh Kumar, Conductor of the bus owned by Haryana Roadways, who has also deposed in the same manner in which RW-1 Bhim Singh had deposed, that the accident had taken place between the bus bearing Registration No. DL-1-P-1529 and the bus of Haryana Roadways, but it was on account of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the bus owned by M/s Kataria Tours and Travellers.

8. Initially, the Appellant had given correct Registration number of the bus owned by M/s Kataria Tours and Travellers, but, later on, by way of amended Claim Petition filed by Appellant on 22.12.1997, he changed the bus Registration number and averred that bus bearing Registration No












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top