SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 327

G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
RAMLAL MOTIRAMJI TAYADE – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Leave granted. For the purpose of implementing the expansion programme undertaken by it, the Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited (respondent No. 3) sent a requisition to the State Government to acquire land in village Paras, District Akola. Thereupon, the State Government issued notification dated 30.11.2008 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') proposing to acquire 132 hectares land. The Appellants, whose lands were included in the notification filed objections under Section 5A(1) and prayed that in view of the policy framed by the State Government not to acquire fertile land, their land may be left out from the process of acquisition. They also pleaded that there was no justification to acquire their land because large tract of government land was available and the same can be transferred to Respondent No. 3. It is the Appellants' case that without giving them opportunity of hearing, the State Government issued the declaration under Section 6, which was published on 30.5.2009. After one year and six months, notice dated 14.2.2011 was issued in respect of 109 hectares only and land comprised in survey Nos. 1033, 1040,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top