SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhaya, JJ.
DHANBIR SINGH - Appellant;
Versus
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 8639 of 2011
Decided on : October 14, 2011
(b) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 3 – Provisions of the Act – In addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law – No provision barring filing of a complaint by a consumer after availing other statutory remedies – A consumer can file a complaint in addition to availing statutory remedies. (Para 8)
Facts of the case:
The appellant purchased a plot from the original allottee. He applied for transfer of the plot, which was duly approved by the competent authority after payment of the extension fee of Rs 62,400. Thereafter, the plot was reallotted to the appellant. However, the building plan submitted by him was not sanctioned on the ground that he was yet to obtain possession of the plot. When the appellant got possession, he found that area of the plot was less by 11.25 sq m. Not only this, he was called upon to pay extension fee up to 31-12-1999 i.e. the date of delivery of possession. A further demand of extension fee amounting to Rs 71,688 was also raised against the appellant.
Feeling aggrieved by the delay in handing over possession of the plot and levy of extension fee, the appellant filed complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, allowed the complaint
The appeal preferred by the respondent against the order of the District Forum was allowed by the State Government. The revision filed by the appellant was summarily dismissed by the National Commission with a cryptic observation that he cannot be permitted “forum shopping”. In the opinion of the National Commission, once the appellant had availed the remedy of appeal, then instead of filing the complaint, he should have pursued the alternative remedy.
Finding of the Court:
Impugned orders cannot be sustained.
ORDER :
1. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the order dated 4-1-2011 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, whereby the appellant's challenge to the order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana (for short “the State Commission”) dismissing the complaint filed by him on the ground that he had already availed the remedy of appeal was negatived.
2. The appellant purchased Plot No. 4228 (measuring 420 sq m) situated in Sector E, Defence Colony, Urban Estate, Jind from the original allottee, Shishpal Singh. He applied for transfer of the plot, which was duly approved by the competent authority after payment of the extension fee of Rs 62,400. Thereafter, the plot was reallotted to the appellant vide office memo dated 10-12-1998. However, the building plan submitted by him was not sanctioned on the ground that he was yet to obtain possession of the plot. When the appellant got possession, he found that area of the plot was less by 11.25 sq m. Not only this, he was called upon to pay extension fee up to 31-12-1999 i.e. the date of delivery of possession. A further demand of extension fee amounting to Rs 71,688 was also raised against the appellant.
3. Feeling aggrieved by the delay in handing over possession of the plot and levy of extension fee, the appellant filed complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) and prayed as under:
“(a) That the demand of the opposite party referred in Para 9 above may please be adjudged as illegal and the opposite party be kindly restrained permanently from the demand and recovering the said amount from the complainant either now or in future.
(b) That the opposite party be kindly directed to issue occupation certificate to the complainant immediately and also to execute and get registered conveyance deed of building constructed on Plot No. 4228, Sector E, Urban Estate, Jind in favour of the complainant without any further delay, since non-judicial stamp papers for conveyance deeds have already been obtained by the opposite party from the complainant.
(c) That the opposite party be kindly ordered to refund excessive transfer fee, excessive extension fee, and excessive sale price at the prevalent market rate of 11.25 sq m to the complainant since bringing till date along with interest deem proper by the Hon'ble Forum.
(d) That lump sum damages of Rs 1,20,000 may kindly be awarded to the complainant towards pain and sufferings of the complainant.”
4. In the reply filed on behalf of the respondent, the demand of extension fee was justified on the premise that the original allottee had not taken possession, which was offered to him vide Memo No. 3050 dated 28-11-1980. It was also pleaded that enhanced extension fee was demanded because the appellant failed to take steps for obtaining possession and to complete the construction within the stipulated period. The respondent also questioned the maintainability of the complaint on the ground that the appeal preferred by the appellant against the demand of extension fee was dismissed by the Administrator, HUDA, Hisar.
5. After considering the pleadings and documents of the parties, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jind (for short “the District Forum”) allowed the complaint and held that there was deficiency in service on the part of the respondent inasmuch as there was delay in giving possession of the plot, the area of the plot was less by 11.25 sq m and excessive transfer fee and extension fee had been demanded. Accordingly, the respondent was directed to refund the excess amount deposited by the appellant with interest @ 15% per annum from the date of deposit. The District Forum also directed payment of compensation of Rs 10,000 and cost of Rs 3000.
6. The appeal preferred by the respondent against the order of the District Forum was allowed by the State Government only on the ground that the appeal filed by the appellant against the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.