Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.K. Sabharwal and D.M. Dharmadhikari, JJ.
LAXMI NARAIN MODI - Petitioner;
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS -Respondents.
Writ Petition (C) No. 309 of 2003
Decided on : November 22, 2004
(b) Environmental law – No proposal to set up a new export zone at Aligarh by UPSIDC or APEDA – Union of India also taking same stand – Cause of action against Respondents 3 and 4 does not survive – These two respondents deleted from the array of parties. (Para 3)
Order
1. If certain State Pollution Control Boards have not responded to CPCB, they have done it at their own peril, since this Court has already issued directions to the State Boards to respond to CPCB. CPCB shall file affidavit during the course of the day. On behalf of the petitioner, request is made for grant of time to file rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
2. In view of the affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent 4 that as of now, there is no proposal to set up a new export zone at Aligarh by UPSIDC or APEDA and same being also the stand of the Union of India, for the present the cause of action against Respondents 3 and 4 does not survive and, therefore, these two respondents are deleted from the array of parties.
3. The case is adjourned.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
