SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 200

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ranjana Prakash Desai & Madan B. Lokur, JJ.
Jumni and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1159 OF 2005
AND
Prem Nath and Another – Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 603 OF 2005
Decided On : 12-03-2014

IMPORTANT POINT
Upon accepting the dying declaration, High Court trying to pick holes in the defence evidence to justify the contents of the dying declaration is not correct manner of appreciating evidence.

Headnote:(a) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 11 – Plea of alibi – Court below proceeding on the basis that the accused are required to prove their innocence – Erroneous – It is for the prosecution to prove guilt of accused – Defence witnesses supporting alibi should not be treated with disbelief. (Para 24, 25, 27, 44)

       (1981) 2 SCC 166; (1997) 1 SCC 283; (2002) 8 SCC 165; 1950 SCR 821 – Relied upon

       (b) Criminal Trial – Appreciation of evidence – After accepting the dying declaration, High Court trying to pick holes in the defence evidence to justify the contents of the dying declaration – Not correct manner of appreciating evidence. (Para 37)

       © Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 32 – Dying declaration – Severability – Deceased mentioning all accused persons as being involved in all the events – Roles of accused persons not severable – However alibi of two accused established and they cannot be held to be involved in the crime – Further, courts below ignoring evidence of DW8 who had seen smoke and flame coming out of the ventilator and found the door locked from inside – It appears more a case of suicide than murder – Accused entitled to benefit of doubt. (Para 42, 45)

       (1975) 3 SCC 241 – Relied upon

       Facts of the case:

       Six relatives (by marriage) of deceased Asha Devi were accused of having murdered her and thereby having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

       Asha Devi was married at the age of 16 to Jagdish who was employed in the army. According to her father, Asha Devi lived with Jagdish for about one year and thereafter she lived in village Bhojpur in district Jagadhari, Haryana, in a one room tenement along with her two children aged 5 years and 1½ years. Her in- laws were staying in an adjacent tenement. There is no allegation or evidence of any matrimonial disharmony between Jagdish and Asha Devi nor is there any allegation of any demand or harassment for dowry from Asha Devi.

       The case of the prosecution is entirely dependent on the dying declaration of Asha Devi. In her statement, Asha Devi stated that at about 12.00 noon on 4th April 1996 she was given a severe beating by all her in-laws. Thereafter, at about 3.00 p.m. she wanted to lodge a complaint with the police but all her in- laws prevented her from doing so. Rather, they suggested that she should be set ablaze.

       On the morning of 5th April 1996, Asha Devi had a quarrel and in a fit of anger she broke her bangles. Upon this all her in-laws tied her up and poured kerosene on her and set her on fire.

       The Trial Judge held that all the accused were guilty of having murdered Asha Devi.

       The accused persons filed Criminal Appeal in the High Court which was dismissed.

       Finding of the Court:

       Alibi of two accused established. They should be discharged of the charges.

       Result: Appeals allowed.

JUDGMENT

Madan B. Lokur, J. –

1. The two questions for consideration and discussion relate to the value of the testimony of alibi witnesses and the severability of a dying declaration.

2. In the present appeals, we are of the opinion that the testimony of the alibi witnesses of two of the four appellants deserves acceptance and the dying declaration so closely concerns all four appellants that it is not possible to sever the role of the sets of appellants, resulting in our giving the benefit of doubt to the remaining two appellants.

The facts:

3. Six relatives (by marriage) of deceased Asha Devi were accused of having murdered her and thereby having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused persons were Rati Ram (father-in-law, now died), Jumni (mother-in-law and appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 1159 of 2005), Sham Lal (brother-in-law and appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 1159 of 2005), Balbir Prasad (brother-in-law and appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1159 of 2005, who, we were told has since died), Prem Nath (brother-in-law and appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 603 of 2005) and Raj Bala (wife of Prem Nath and appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 603 of 2005).

4. Asha Devi was married at the age of 16 to Jagdish who was employed in the army. According to her father, Asha Devi lived with Jagdish for about one year and thereafter she lived in village Bhojpur in district Jagadhari, Haryana, in a one room tenement along with her two children aged 5 years and 1½ years. Her in- laws were staying in an adjacent tenement. There is no allegation or evidence of any matrimonial disharmony between Jagdish and Asha Devi who had been married for about nine years nor is there any allegation of any demand or harassment for dowry from Asha Devi.

5. The case of the prosecution is entirely dependent on the dying

declaration of Asha Devi. In her statement, Asha Devi stated that at about

12.00 noon on 4th April 1996 she was given a severe beating by all her in-

laws. Thereafter, at about 3.00 p.m. she wanted to lodge a complaint with

the police but all her in- laws prevented her from doing so. Rather, they

suggested that she should be set ablaze.

6. On the morning of 5th April 1996, Asha Devi seems to have had a quarrel and in a fit of anger she broke her bangles. Upon this, Jumni said that she should be finished. Consequently, all her in-laws tied her up and poured kerosene on her and set her on fire. This was at about 7.30 a.m.

7. At about 10.30 a.m. Asha Devi was taken to the Civil Hospital at Jagadhari. Seeing her condition with 100% burns, the doctor on duty, Dr. M.R. Passi (PW-1) immediately informed the police who took urgent steps for having her statement recorded. Ms. Sarita Gupta, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class (PW-9) was deputed for this purpose. According to Ms. Sarita Gupta, she recorded the statement of Asha Devi in the Civil Hospital between 11.22 a.m. and 12.05 p.m. on 5th April 1996. The statement/dying declaration reads as follows:-

“Stated that I was married at the age of 16 years. I am 25 years old. I have two sons, one is 5 years old while the second is 1½ old. My husband is serving in military. Sometimes he visits us after a week and sometimes after 15 days. In my house, my father-in-law Rati Ram, mother-in-law Jumni, Jeth Prem Chand, Jethani Bala Rani, two Devars Sham Lal and Balbir Parshad are staying. My father-in-law, mother-in-law, Jeth Jethani and both the Devers had been harassing me from the very beginning. My mother-in-law, father-in-law, Jeth Jethani and both the Devers had been making plans to eliminate me. Last week my mother-in-law, father-in-law, Jeth, Jethani and Devers said, “let us get her bitten from a dog and in this way she would be eliminated”. Yesterday, during noon time, my mother-in-law, father-in-law, Devers, Jeth and Jethani had given me severe beatings. Thereafter yesterday at about 3.00 PM when I was about to go to police station to lodge a report, all of them prevente




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top