SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.V. Raveendran & A.K. Patnaik, JJ.
Guru Charan Singh
Vs.
State of U. P. & Ors.
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 12469 of 2010, Special Appeal No. 115 of 2010
Decided On : 24 June, 2011
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 136 - U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sent papers to District Inspector of Schools - Selection and appointment Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services - Petitioner was given appointment after selection till duly selected candidate joins post By communication District Inspector of Schools provisionally fixed salary of post Lecturer in Hindi Department Institution and by another communication District Inspector of Schools approved temporary appointment of petitioner in original post Assistant Teacher up to time of joining duties by candidate duly selected by Commission or up to time of demotion post of Lecturer to his original post of Assistant Teacher whichever of two occurred earlier in time - Petitioner accordingly worked as an Assistant Teacher in Institution until his services were terminated pursuant to order District Inspector of Schools – Held, Court need not deal with these contentions counsel for petitioner because court find from paragraph Counter Affidavit of respondent in this Court that as against requisition of Committee Institution Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Board after conducting selection has selected one Kumar for Institution and had assumed his duty against vacant post of Assistant Teacher on appointment of petitioner to post Assistant Teacher in Institution was made by Committee of Institution and approved by District Inspector Schools for limited period up to date of joining candidate duly selected by Commission and such candidate duly selected by Selection Board has already joined his petitioners appointment even if valid has come Court further find from copy of letter Principal of Institution to District Inspector of Schools annexed to counter affidavit of respondent Annexure petitioner has drawn salary as an Assistant Teacher up to and thereafter - Hence question of granting any monetary relief to petitioner also does not arise – Petition dismissed
JUDGMENT
A.K. PATNAIK, J.
1. This is a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution against the impugned order dated 27.01.2010 of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dismissing Special Appeal No.115 of 2010 of the petitioner against the order dated 21.12.2009 of the learned Single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.11400 of 2005.
2. The relevant facts very briefly are that one Gajendra Singh Rathi was working as an Assistant Teacher in the Department of Hindi in L.T. Grade in Kisan Inter College, Mohiuddinpur, Meerut, in the State of Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as `the Institution'). In the Institution, a new section in Class XII of the Arts Faculty was opened in 1973 and in this new section of Class XII Gajendra Singh Rathi was appointed as a Lecturer in Hindi. The District Inspector of Schools, Meerut, however, cancelled the appointment of Gajendra Singh Rathi as a Lecturer in Hindi in Class XII of the Institution. Gajendra Singh Rathi filed Suit No.795 of 1969 and the Court of the Vth Additional Civil Judge, Meerut, decreed the suit declaring Gajendra Singh Rathi as a Lecturer in the Department of Hindi in the Institution by judgment and decree dated 03.01.1991. Consequently, there was a vacancy in the post of Hindi Teacher in L.T. Grade in the Institution. On 10.06.1993, the Principal/Manager of Institution notified several vacancies in the post of Assistant Teachers in the Institution on the Notice Board of the Institution inviting competent and qualified teachers possessing educational qualifications of BA/B.Ed./LT to appear in the interview in the office of the Institution on 27.06.1993 for appointment to the vacancies. The petitioner appeared in the interview and was selected as an Assistant Teacher in L.T. Grade by the Committee of the Institution on 27.06.1993. The Prabandh Sanchalak, who was managing the affairs of the Institution, sent the papers to the District Inspector of Schools, Meerut, along with a covering letter dated 29.06.1993 stating therein that consequent upon the promotion of Gajendra Singh Rathi to the post of Lecturer in Hindi in the Institution, the petitioner was given appointment after selection till duly selected candidate joins the post. By a communication dated 24.12.1994, the District Inspector of Schools provisionally fixed the salary of Gajendra Singh Rathi in the post of Lecturer in the Hindi Department of the Institution and by another communication dated 04.03.1995 the District Inspector of Schools approved the temporary appointment of the petitioner in the original post of Assistant Teacher up to the time of joining duties by a candidate duly selected by the Commission or up to the time of demotion of Gajendra Singh Rathi from the post of Lecturer to his original post of Assistant Teacher, whichever of the two occurred earlier in time. The petitioner accordingly worked as an Assistant Teacher in the Institution until his services were terminated pursuant to the order dated 13.01.1005 of the District Inspector of Schools.
3. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.11400 of 2005 in the Allahabad High Court and on 28.02.2005 a learned Single Judge of the High Court hearing the writ petition stayed the order of termination. After counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4, learned Single Judge of the High Court heard the writ petition and dismissed the same by order dated 21.12.2009. Learned Single Judge of the High Court held that after 14.07.1992 the vacancy which occurred on account of promotion of Gajendra Singh Rathi to the post of Lecturer was actually a substantive vacancy and the Committee of the Institution had no authority to make any selection and appointment to this vacancy of Assistant Teacher in Hindi in the Institution and it was only the Committee constituted under the U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 which could make the selection and appointment to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.