SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 998

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.S. Singhvi & C. Nagappan, JJ.
State of Haryana and others
Vs.
Sita Ram and others
Civil Appeal Nos. 5411-5430 of 2009 With Civil Appeal Nos. 5431-5441, 5442-5459, 5460-5479, 5480-5499, 5500-5516, 5517, 5518-5537,5538, 5539, 5541, 5543, 5544, 5545 of 2009 Civil Appeal No.912 of 2010, C.W.P. Nos. 12497, 13299, 17222, 17525, 17526, 17527, 18096, 15318, 15330, 15517, 15563, 16354, 16317, 16316, 16121, 12702 of 2002, 3157, 3442, 3564 & 4266 of 2003]
Decided On : 29 October, 2013

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Neeraj Jain, Senior Advocate, Mrs. Anubha Agarwal, Mr. Ambuj Agarwal, Advocates, with him for the Appellant.
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Mr. Ajay K. Singh, Mr. Sanjeev K. Saroha, Mr. Vikas Batra, Mr. R.C. Kaushik, Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocates, for the Respondents.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 309 - Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998 - Conditions of employment - Interests of Government on technical supervision of contractors work - Whether work charge service of respondents can be treated as regular service for purpose of grant benefit under the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998 (for short, the 1998 Rules) is the question which arises for consideration in these appeals filed against the orders passed by the Division Benches of the Punjab and Haryana High Court – Held, Reading of the scheme framed by the Board makes it clear that the benefit of time-bound promotional scales was to be given to the employees only on their completing 9/16 years regular service. Likewise, the benefit of promotional increments could be given only on completion of 23 years regular service. The use of the term regular service in various paragraphs of the scheme shows that service rendered by an employee after regular appointment could only be counted for computation of 9/16/23 years service and the service of a temporary, ad hoc or work-charged employee cannot be counted for extending the benefit of time-bound promotional scales or promotional increments. If the Board intended that total service rendered by the employees irrespective of their mode of recruitment and status should be counted for the purpose of grant of time-bound promotional scales or promotional increments, then instead of using the expression 9/16 years regular service or 23 years regular service, the authority concerned would have used the expression 9/16 years service or 23 years service. However, the fact of the matter is that the scheme in its plainest term embodies the requirement of 9/16 years regular service or 23 years regular service as a condition for grant of time- bound promotional scales or promotional increments – appeal allowed

JUDGMENT

G.S. Singhvi, J.

1. Whether the work charge service of the respondents can be treated as regular service for the purpose of grant of benefit under the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998 (for short, 'the 1998 Rules') is the question which arises for consideration in these appeals filed against the orders passed by the Division Benches of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

2. The respondents in all the appeals except Civil Appeal No.5544 of 2009, which has been filed by Haryana Urban Development Authority, were engaged as work charge employees in different branches of the Public Works Department of the Government of Haryana between 1966 and 1984. Their conditions of employment were governed by the provisions contained in PWD Code, paragraphs 1.129 and 1.132 of which are reproduced below:

'II-Work-Charged Establishment

1.129. Works establishment will include such establishment as is employed upon the actual execution, as distinct from the general supervision, of a specific work, of or sub-works of a specific project, or upon the subordinate supervision of departmental labour, stores and machinery in connection with such work or sub-works, provided that as an exception to the above, mistries and mates employed in the interests of Government on the technical supervision of contractors work and khalasis attached to subordinates for assisting them on works will be treated a work-charged establishment. When employees borne on the temporary-establishment are employed on work of this nature, their pay should, for the time being be charged direct, to the work.

(2) Works establishment does not include Clerks, Draftsman, Subordinate or extra establishment of any kind for the Divisional or Sub-Divisional Offices, such being properly chargeable to Temporary Establishment, but where Dak Runners are employed solely for a particular work of a temporary nature, for a period not exceeding six months, they may be treated as work-charged establishment.

(3) The Chief Engineer and Superintending Engineers are empowered to classify as 'Works' or 'Temporary' those classes of establishment about whose correct definition there is doubt, subject to the concurrence of the Audit Officer and to the proviso the general principles for entertainment of such establishment are not infringed.

(4) Chief and Superintending Engineer are authorized to waive the rule which requires that works establishments must be employed on a specific work and to determine, in such cases the properties in which the cost of such establishment shall be allocated between the works concerned.

Note - As an exception to the general rule, the cost of Khalasis attached to subordinate may be charged to annual maintenance and Repairs and other estimates in such provision for it has been made with the sanction of the Superintending Engineer, or the Chief Engineer, Electricity Branch, as the case may be.

(5) The cost of the works establishment must be shown as a separate sub-head of the estimate for a work.

(6) All pay bill for work-charged establishment shall be pre-audited by the Divisional Accountant and approved by the Divisional Officer before payment. Before a member of the work-charged establishment, whose services have been dispensed with, is settled up under paragraph 303 of the Pubic Works Account code, the Sub- Divisional Officer should invariably ascertain from the Divisional Office if there are any out standings against the man.

(7) Members of the work-charged establishment, other than Road Inspectors, who are engaged on the footing of monthly services will be subject to discharge at 10 days' notice except in the case of serious misconduct or gross inefficiency (when no notice will be given) or on payment of pay for 10 days or for such period up to this extent as may be due to them in lieu of notice. Should they desire to resign will be required to give 10 days notice or forfeit pay for this period or for such period up to this extent as may be due to th
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top