DIPAK MISRA, VIKRAMAJIT SEN
Shamim Bano – Appellant
Versus
Asraf Khan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J. –
Leave granted.
2. The appellant, Shamim Bano, and the respondent, Asraf Khan, were married on 17.11.1993 according to the Muslim Shariyat law. As the appellant was meted with cruelty and torture by the husband and his family members regarding demand of dowry, she was compelled to lodge a report at the Mahila Thana, Durg, on 6.9.1994, on the basis of which a criminal case under Section 498 – A read with Section 34 IPC was initiated and, eventually, it was tried by the learned Magistrate at Rajnandgaon who acquitted the accused persons of the said charges.
3. Be it noted, during the pendency of the criminal case under Section 498 – A/34 IPC before the trial court, the appellant filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Code”) in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg for grant of maintenance on the ground of desertion and cruelty. While the application for grant of maintenance was pending, divorce between the appellant and the respondent took place on 5.5.1997. At that juncture, the appellant filed Criminal Case No. 56 of 1997 under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum and others[(1985) 2 SCC 556] [Para 8] – Referred
Danial Latifi and another v. Union of India[(2001) 7 SCC 740] [Para 9] – Referred
Khatoon Nisa v. State of U.P. and Ors.
Shabana Bano v. Imran Khan[(2010) 1 SCC 666] [Para 14] – Referred
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.