SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 388

ANIL R.DAVE, DIPAK MISRA
Commnr. of Income Tax-VII, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Punjab Stainless Steel Industries – Respondent


JUDGMENT

ANIL R. DAVE, J. –

1. Being aggrieved by the judgment delivered in ITA No. 520 of 2006 dated 19th January, 2007, by the High Court of Delhi, this Appeal has been filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax.

2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, in a nutshell, are as under:

So as to encourage export for the purpose of earning foreign exchange, Section 80 HHC has been enacted in the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). By virtue of the provisions of the said section, subject to certain conditions, the exporter gets certain deduction from the income, which is derived from the profits from export of goods, while computing taxable income.

3. For the purpose of calculating the deduction, according to the provisions of Section 80HHC of the Act, one has to take into account the profits from the business of the assessee, export turnover and total turnover. The deduction, subject to several other conditions, incorporated in the Section, is determined as under:

Profits of the Business X Export Turnover Total Turnover

4. Thus, to determine the amount of deduction, the assessee and the Revenue must be aware of the following three ingredients:

i) Profits of the bus





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top