SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A. K. Patnaik, Surinder Singh Nijjar, Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, JJ.
Common Cause – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 114 OF 2014
Decided On : 16-05-2014
(b) Mining laws – 29 mining leases either determined or rejected or lapsed – Direction for keeping these leases under suspension – Liberty given to move concerned authorities/court/tribunal for appropriate relief – Further liberty given to move Supreme Court thereafter for modification of this interim order. (Para 4)
(c) Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 – Rule 24A(6) and section 8(2) and 8(3), Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 – 53 mining leases operating and having requisite approvals – 3 leases not having forest approvals – Out of these 56 leases, lease deeds executed in 16 cases – Rest 40 leases operating under deemed renewal – Out of these, 14 under first renewal deemed to be extended and may be allowed to operate – Balance 26 leases under second and subsequent renewal – Not covered under rule 24A(6) and section 8(2) – Cannot be allowed to operate till orders are issued by State government – State directed to pass speaking order within six months. (Para 5, 6, 9, 10)
Writ Petition (C) No. 435 of 2012 – Relied upon
Facts of the case:
This case relates to passing of interim orders in respect of mining leases in Odisha which are operating with and without necessary sanction/clearance.
Finding of the Court:
Interim orders need to be passed.
Result: Interim matter disposed of.
ORDER
A. K. PATNAIK, J.
This writ petition relates to mining in the State of Odisha. When the writ petition was heard on the preliminary point on 21.04.2014, we found from the averments in paragraph 14 of the writ petition that several lessees were operating without clearances under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and without renewal by the Government and we were of the opinion that an interim order needs to be passed in respect of the lessees who are operating the leases in violation of the law. On 21.04.2014, therefore, while issuing notice in the writ petition, we directed that the matter be listed on 28.04.2014 for consideration of the interim order that should be passed in the writ petition. On 21.04.2014, we also directed that the CEC, in the meanwhile, will make out a list of such lessees who are operating the leases in violation of the law and granted liberty to the parties to produce their papers before the CEC and directed that the State of Odisha and the Union of India will cooperate with the CEC to prepare the list.
2. Pursuant to the order passed on 21.04.2014, the CEC examined the matter during a meeting held on 24.04.2014 with the Chief Secretary, the Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Mines), the Principal Secretary (Forest), the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and other senior officers of the Government of Odisha as well as Dr. V.P. Upadhyay, Director IA (Non-Coal Mining) and Mrs. Bharati, Director (AOHQ), of the Ministry of Environment and Forests and the Secretary General, Federation of Indian Mining Industries (FIMI) and also examined the representations received by the CEC on behalf of the lease holders, and has submitted a report dated 25.4.2014.
3. We have considered the report dated 25.4.2014 of the CEC, and the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for different parties, and we find that 102 mining leases do not have requisite environmental clearances, approvals under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, approved Mining Plan and/or Consent to Operate. A list of these 102 mining leases is annexed to the report of the CEC as Annexure R-2. The CEC has, however, stated in the report that mining operations in these 102 mining leases have been suspended and these 102 mining leases have been classified as non-working leases. We direct that mining operations in these 102 mining leases listed in Annexure R-2 of the report of the CEC shall remain suspended, but it will be open to such lessees to move the concerned authorities for environmental clearances, approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, approval of Mining Plan or Consent to Operate and as and when the mining lessees are able to obtain all the clearances/approval/consent, they may move this Court for modification of this interim order in relation to their cases.
4. We further find that 29 mining leases listed in Annexure R-3 to the report of the CEC have been determined or have been rejected or have lapsed. We direct that mining operations in these 29 mining leases will also remain suspended, but it will be open for the lessees of these 29 mining leases to move the concerned authorities or the Court or the Tribunal for necessary relief and as and when they get appropriate relief from the concerned authorities or the Court or the Tribunal, they may move this Court for modification of this interim order in relation to their cases.
5. We also find that 53 iron ore/manganese mining leases listed in Annexure R-4 to the report of the CEC are operating and all of them are having approvals under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Consent to Operate granted by the Odisha State Pollution Control Board and approved Mining Plans and 3 more mining leases listed in Annexure R-5 are located in forest as well as in non-forest land and those located in non-forest area do not have approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Hence, a total of 56 iron ore/manganese mining leases are presentl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.