B.S.CHAUHAN, S.A.BOBDE
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
1. Issue notice in W.P. (C) No. 829/2013.
2. Application for deletion of the name of Petitioner No. 1 in T.P. (C) Nos. 47 of 2013 is allowed.
3. T.P. (C) Nos. 47-48 of 2013 and T.P. (C) No. 476 of 2013 are allowed in terms of the signed order.
4. All the matters require to be heard finally. List all matters for final hearing after the Constitution Bench is over.
5. In the meanwhile, no person should suffer for not getting the Adhaar card inspite of the fact that some authority had issued a circular making it mandatory and when any person applies to get the Adhaar Card voluntarily, it may be checked whether that person is entitled for it under the law and it should not be given to any illegal immigrant.
6. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.
7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that this is a fit case where the prayer for transfer is to be allowed.
8. On the facts of the case, we allow these Transfer Petitions and direct that W.P. (C) No. 439 of 2012 titled S. Raju v. Govt. of India and Ors. pending before the D.B. of the High Court of Judicature at Madras and PIL No. 10 of 2012 titled Vickram Krishna and Ors. v. UIDAI and Ors. pending befor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.