SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1074

V.S.SIRPURKAR, T.S.THAKUR
Assistant Electrical Engineer – Appellant
Versus
Satyendra Rai – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 28th May, 2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Crl. Miscellaneous No. 19178 of 2007 whereby the High Court has quashed the first information report No. 18 of 2007.

2. The brief facts of this case are, that on 24.1.2007 at about 12.30 p.m., a raiding party led by Vijay Kumar Singh, Assistant Electrical Engineer conducted a surprise raid in the premises of the rice mill of the Respondent No. 1 in Village Dariyapur under Naubatpur Police Station and found a 5 H.P. Motor running directly with electrical energy extracted from the main supply line illegally by attaching a hook. Thereafter, the Assistant Electrical Engineer Naubatpur filed a complaint before the police on the same day with regard to the theft of electricity being committed by the Respondent No. 1 and on the basis of the said complaint, a first information report was registered bearing Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2007 for the offences punishable under Sections 39/44 of the Electricity Act, 1910.

3. It is an admitted position that at that time when the complaint was filed, the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act")

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top