H.L.DATTU, S.A.BOBDE
Union of India (UOI) Through Director of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Tata Chemicals – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. The issue that arise for our consideration and decision in this batch of appeals is, whether the revenue is legally responsible Under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, "the Act") for payment of interest on the refund of tax made to the resident/deductor Under Section 240 of the Act.
3. At the outset, it is relevant to notice that the assessment years in all these appeals are on and after 01.04.1989, that is after the admittance of Section 244A of the Act by Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 (4 of 1988) with effect from 01.04.1989, whereby provision for interest on refunds on any amount due to the Assessee under the Act was introduced.
FACTS:
4. We would refer to the facts in Civil Appeal No. 6301 of 2011. The Respondent is a company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in the manufacture of nitrogenous fertilizer. During the assessment year 1997-98, the Respondent-company had commissioned its naptha desulphurization plant and to oversee the operation of the said plant it had sought the assistance of two technicians from M/s. Haldor Topsoe, Denmark. M/s. Haldor Topsoe had raised an invoice aggregating to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.