SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 288

T.S.THAKUR, C.NAGAPPAN
Subrata Chattoraj – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioner:Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharya, Ashok Bhan, Sr.Advocates, K.C. Mittal, Subhasish Bhowmick, Dipak Bhattacharyya, Rabi Shankar Chattopadhayay, Niti Luthra, R.K.Rathore, Anindya Sunder Das, Suresh Chandra Tripathy, Subrato Mukhopadhayay, S.K.Sabharwal, Advocates.
For the Respondents:R.K.Khanna, ASG, S.K. Bagaria, ASG, N.K. Karhail, Mini Kaushik, Ashok K. Shrivastava, Anirudh Tanwar, Sushma Suri, Siddharth Luthraa, ASG, Mukul Gupta, ASG, A.K.Srivastava, Aseem Swaroop, Suverna Kashyap, Ashok Dhamija, Shadman Ali, K.K.Karhail, B.V. Balaram Das, D.S. Mahara, C.S. Vaidyanathan,Sr.Adv. (West Bengal), Anip Sachthey, Haripriya Padmanabhan, Suhaan Mukherjee, Mohit Paul, Kabir S. Bose, Ramesh Babu M.R., Swati Setia,, Manisha, P.P.Tripathi, Sr. Advocate, Bhargava V. Deasi, Shreyas Mehrotra, P.V.Shetty, Sr. Advocate, Mahesh Thakur, Vybhav Ramesh, Liz Mathew, Arjun Singh Bhati, Siddharth Bhatnagar, Prasenjit Keswani, Sonia Dube, S. Chakraborty, Prateek Jalan for M/S. Legal Options, Samir Ali Khan, P. Sajith, Kirti Renu Mishra, Apurva Upmanyu, Gopal Subramaanium, Sr. Advocate, Gaurikaruna Das Mohanti, Shibashish Misra, Anip Sachthey, Kabir S.Bose, Shagun Matta, Advocates.
For the Intervenor:Amandeep Singh, Sumit Kumar, Subhajit Pal, Abhishek Shaw, Advocates.

Judgment :

Mr. C.S.Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel for the respondent has filed an affidavit pursuant to our order dated 26.03.2014. He has also separately filed in a sealed cover a list of names of persons who are according to Mr. Vaidyanathan required to be investigated in view of the disclosures made and the evidence collected sofar by the Investigating Agency. The basis on which the Investigating Agency has named the persons in the list is not however evident from the list. Mr. Vaidyanathan, therefore, offers to file a synopsis of the basis on which the names mentioned in the list have been included in the said list and the evidence which incriminates them calling for further investigation into their role and conduct. We see no reason to decline the prayer for time to enable Mr. Vaidyanathan to do the needful which may be done on or before 16.04.2014.

Post on 16.04.2014 for continuation. List of names furnished by Mr. Vaidyanathan in the sealed covered shall be kept in a sealed cover by the Registry. An affidavit has been filed by the State of Odisha pursuant to our direction dated 26.03.2014 in which the State has identified three independent FIRs in which the larger con



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top