SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1011

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, JJ.

Arnesh Kumar
Versus
State of Bihar
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No. 9127 of 2013
Decided on : 31-10-2013

Advocate Appeared
For Petitioner:Arvind Varma, Sr. Advocate, Rakesh Kumar, Kaushal Yadav, Advocates.

The court permitted the impleadment of a spouse as a party respondent and granted the petitioner provisional bail under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the event of arrest or surrender within a four-week period.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 438(2) - Provisional bail - Petitioner seeking impleadment of spouse as party respondent - Petitioner expresses readiness to keep spouse with dignity - Court orders personal appearance of both parties and deposit of expenses for spouse's appearance.

(B) Interim Relief - Direction for provisional enlargement on bail in the event of surrender or arrest within a specified period, subject to conditions stipulated under the law.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to implead spouse as a respondent in a special leave petition and stated a willingness to provide for the spouse with dignity. The court ordered the personal presence of both the petitioner and the spouse, requiring the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- to cover the spouse's expenses for appearing before the court.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the impleadment of the spouse and issued notice to the respondents. It directed that both the petitioner and the spouse be personally present on the next hearing date.

Issues: Whether the spouse should be impleaded as a respondent and the provision of interim protection from arrest for the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the petitioner should be provisionally enlarged on bail if arrested or surrendering within four weeks, contingent upon the conditions stipulated in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Result: Notice issued and provisional bail granted.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • crime and sentencing
    • bail
      • anticipatory bail
  • practice and procedure
    • impleadment
    • notice
    • personal appearance
    • deposit of expenses

Judgment :

Taken on board.

Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for impleading petitioner's wife as party respondent no.2 in the special leave petition. Let her be impleaded as such.

Amended cause title be filed within a week.

Learned Senior Counsel further states that the petitioner is prepared to keep his wife with dignity.

Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 25.11.2013.

On the next date of hearing, both the petitioner and respondent no.2 shall be personally present before this Court.

To defray the expenses of respondent no.2 to appear before this court on 25.11.2013, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- within a week in the Registry of this Court.

Till the next date of hearing, we direct that in case the petitioner surrenders or is arrested within four weeks, he will be provisionally enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting authority or the court in seisin of the case, subject to the conditions stipulated in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top