SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 508

J.CHELAMESWAR, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
Ashwini Thanappan – Appellant
Versus
Dir. of Education – Respondent


Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioner:A. Subba Rao, K.L.D.S. Vinober, Advocates.

Judgment :

Issue notice.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that interpretation of Article 27 arises for consideration of this Court. It is also pointed out by the learned counsel that the judgment reported in Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust and Others Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2014(7) SCALE 306 is inconsistent with the judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court in P.A. Inamdar and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others 2005(6) SCC 537

Prima facie, we are of the opinion that the submission requires a further examination. If such examination is to be undertaken, the implications will have impact on all the States, in which case perhaps it is desirable to put all the States on notice and matter be heard by a Bench of appropriate strength. We, therefore, deem it appropriate to direct the Registry to place the matter before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate directions in the matter.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top