SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 766

H. L. DATTU, ANIL R. DAVE, S. A. BOBDE
SURENDRA KOLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. This application has been filed by the petitioner before us with the prayer to reopen the Review Petition (Crl.) No. 395 of 2014 and grant the petitioner an open hearing before a three Judge Bench of this Court in light of the decision of this Court in Mohd. Arif and others v. The Registrar, Supreme Court of India and Ors.(Writ Petition(Crl.) No. 77 of 2014) delivered on 02.09.2014.

2. The Constitution Bench of this Court in Mohd Arif case (supra) has carved out a separate niche of review petitions in cases where death penalty has been confirmed by this Court and held that limited oral hearing of such petitions is mandated by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This Court in conclusion has observed as under:

“74. We make it clear that the law laid down in this judgment, viz., the right of a limited oral hearing in review petitions where death sentence is given, shall be applicable only in pending review petitions and such petitions filed in future. It will also apply where a review petition is already dismissed but the death sentence is not executed so far. In such cases, the Petitioners can apply for the reopening of their review petition within one month from the date











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top