SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 809

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, ARUN MISHRA
V. KANNAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL SECY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

J.S.Khehar, J.

Leave granted.

The appellants in these appeals were originally inducted into the service of Bank of Madura. By virtue of a scheme of amalgamation sanctioned by the Reserve Bank of India, the Bank of Madura was merged with the Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Bank (hereinafter referred to as the `ICICI Bank') with effect from 10.03.2001. Consequent upon the aforesaid merger, the appellants became the employees of the ICICI Bank.

2. All the appellants are retirees, having sought voluntary retirement from the ICICI Bank. Their retirement was operative with effect from 31.07.2003. The appellants' claim is for pension. The instant claim emerges from the Bank of Madura Employees' Pension Regulation, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the `1995 Regulations'). The 1995 Regulations define the voluntary retirement scheme in Regulation 2(ze). The same is being extracted hereunder:

“`V.R.S.' means Bank of Madura Employees' Voluntary Retirement Scheme enclosed to the circular CO.STF:39/94-95 dated July 21, 1994, or any other specific scheme, that may be implemented in future bringing such scheme under the definition of this regulation. The employees who hav
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top