SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1914 Supreme(SC) 51

Levine – Appellant
Versus
Serling – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Lawrence Jones and Co., Redden, Blake , G. Williamson, Smith , H.O. Dauchwerts, P. Lediew, Geoffrey Lawrence

Lord Moulton:-

Their Lordships have examined the authorities as to the practice of this Board with regard to the date from which an order for leave to appeal in for ma pauperis takes effect, and they are clearly of opinion that the settled practice is the same as that of the High Court, namely, that the order takes effect only from the date at which it is made, and has no effect whatever on costs incurred before that date.

The application, therefore, that the costs of the petition for special leave to appeal in forma pauperis may be taxed upon the pauper scale, must be dismissed, but there will be no costs of the application.

Application rejected.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top