SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1915 Supreme(SC) 55

Amir Chand – Appellant
Versus
Bakshi Harihar Prashad Singh and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nevill, Rogers , Barrow, Dube

Sir John Edge :—

The plaintiff in the suit in which this appeal has arisen is Babu Amir Chand, the adopted son and representative of Babu Fakir Chand, deceased. On the 29th March, 1888, one Bakshi Bam Newaz Singh obtained a decree for sale, under S. 88 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (Act IV of 1882), of certain immovable property of which he was a mortgagee. To the suit in which that decree was made Babu Fakir Chand was a defendant. An order absolute for sale, under S. 89 of that Code was made in the suit for sale on the 4th January 1902 by the Trial Judge, and was confirmed on appeal by the High Court at Calcutta on the 18th December 1903. The representatives of Bakshi Ram Newaz Singh thereupon applied for execution of the decree for sale. On the 18th May 1904 Babu Amir Chand, who was the representative of Babu Fakir Chand, then dead, presented to the Court executing the decree for sale a petition of objections under S. 211 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882, Act XIV of 1882. Some of Babu Amir Chand's objections were allowed, others of his objections were disallowed on the ground, amongst others, that he had failed to support them by sufficient evidence.

On the 23rd January









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top