Sir John Edge :—

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in the suit from a decree of the Chief Court of the Punjab, which had dismissed their appeal from a decree of the Trial Judge by which their suit had been dismissed. The respondents to this appeal have not appeared.

In their plaint, dated the 3rd May 1905, the plaintiffs alleged that they, "like the land-owners, are the proprietors" of houses and vacant sites in Patti Lak and had paid tirni (grazing dues) in respect of village shamilat land (common land) of Lak, and they claimed a declaration that they

"Like proprietors, may be declared co-sharers in 30,838 bighas 13/4 kanals of the village shamilat land of Patti Lak in proportion to Rs. 29-15-7, the tirni paid by the plaintiffs, and a share (may be) awarded to them in the said village shamilat of Patti lak on the said tirni amount according to the Khewat."

It is to be observed that in their plaint the plaintiffs did not base their claim to share on the partition of the common lands of Patti Lak upon any right as proprietors of any lands assessed to the revenue in Patti Lak. The plaintiffs were not recorded in the khewat as persons paying land revenue in respect of land held by them