SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1915 Supreme(SC) 21

Privy Council
Sir Arthur Channell, Sir George Farwell , Parmoor, Lords Atkinson , Justice Viscount Haldane, JJ.
Eastern Trust Company -Appellant
Versus
MaKenzie Mann and Co., Ld. -Resopndent
Decided On : 27-04-1915

Advocates Appeared:
Huxtable, Blyth , Paines, T.T. Paine, H. Mellish , P.O. Lawrence, Geoffrey Lawrence, T.S. Rogers , Brown, Addison , Linklater, R.B. Finlay

Sir George Farwell :-

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada (Duff, J., dissenting), which reversed the unanimous judgment of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, dated the 5th July 1913, varying the report dated 15th January 1912, of the referee appointed by the Court in this action. The action is a partnership action between James Irvine, since deceased, as plaintiff, and Robert G. Hervey and others as defendants, and a decree was made therein by Graham, J., on March 13th, 1905, whereby the partnership was dissolved and certain accounts and inquiries were directed to be taken by a referee appointed by the Court. The respondents, Mackenzie and Mann and Company, Limited, were made parties to the action under the following circumstances. In June 1902 the Harvey Trust and Guarantee Company, as agents for the partners Irvine and R.G. Hervey, controlled all the capital, stock, and bonds of the Nova Scotia Southern Railway Company, which had been formed by the partners, who were unable to complete its construction, and arrangements had been made whereby the railway was to be completed by the Halifax and South-Western Railway Company, and Government subsidies were to be paid to that company in respect of the Nova Scotia line, which would form part of the said Halifax and South-Western Railway when completed; and on the 13th June 1902 an agreement was entered into between the trust company, as agents for the two partners of the one part, and the respondents Mackenzie and Mann and Company, Limited (therein and hereinafter called the contractors), of the other part, whereby the partners agreed to sell and the contractors agreed to buy all the stock and bonds of the said Nova Scotia Railway Company for 275.000 dollars, of which 75,000 dollars were to be paid in fully paid capital stock of the said Halifax Company at par on an event which has happened and the balance 200,000 dollars as follows :- 5,000 dollars on execution and the balance, 195,000 dollars, from time to time to the extent of 50 per cent. of the amounts paid by Government on account of loans or subsidies in respect of the said Nova Scotia line as and when such amounts were paid until the whole 195,000 dollars were paid.

"Provided that if the 50 per cent. be not sufficient to pay the 195,000 dollars in full, the balance shall be paid when the said loans and subsidies have been all received by the said company."

There is a further proviso which will be dealt with more conveniently later.

The sum payable by the contractors would form part of the assets of the partnership of which the Court had undertaken the administration, and would be applicable primarily in discharging the debts of the firm, including their indebtedness to the Nova Scotia Company, and inasmuch as the contractors owned all the stock and shares of that company, the discharge of the company's debts would enure for their benefit by increasing the value of the company's assets, and consequently of its stock, shares and securities. The substantial question in the case is the amount payable under the contract by the contractors.

On 29th January 1904 a Receiver was appointed of such assets, and an injunction was granted restraining the defendants Hervey and the Hervey Trust Company from receiving from the contractors or the provincial treasurer of the Province all or any part of the 195,000 dollars.

When this appeal was opened before their Lordships it was treated as common ground that by September 27th, 1907, the total subsidy then paid by Government was 397,080,90 dollars :-

"One half of this 19,854,045 dollars is a sum sufficient to pay more than the amount called for under the contract of June 13th, 1902."

This subsidy was paid on mileage. The inquiry with regard to this matter is given in the order of 24th November 1908 : "What balance remains due and owing in respect of the consideration moneys payable under the said contract dated June 13th, 1902, to the parties entitled under the said agree























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top