SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(SC) 75

(Maharaja) Ramnarain Singh – Appellant
Versus
Adhindra Nath Mukherji and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
E. Dalgado, Nevill, Rogers , Barrow, J.M. Parikh, Robert Finlay , B. Dube, De Gruyther

Lord Parker:-

This is the rehearing of an appeal from the High Court at Calcutta, dated the 30th August 1911, which set aside a preliminary decree of the Subordinate Judge and remitted the case to the Court of the Subordinate Judge to be dealt with in accordance with certain directions contained in the judgment of the High Court. At the original hearing the, present respondents did not appear and the appellant obtained an order setting aside the decree of the High Court at Calcutta and dismissing the action in which the appeal arose. Subsequently the respondents obtained an order of His Majesty discharging the order thus made on the ground that it was by the fraud of his agent that he was not represented by counsel at the hearing, and directing the appeal to be reheard, the costs thrown away to be dealt with upon such rehearing. The appeal has accordingly been reheard before their Lordships, who have had the advantage of hearing counsel on both sides, The facts out of which this action arose may be stated as follows : In 1896, Maharajah Shri Ramnarayan Singh Bahadur (whom their Lordships will hereafter refer to as the mortgagor) executed in favour of Rai Jadunath Mukerji Bahadur (wh









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top