SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(SC) 45

Nobin Chandra Barua and others – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Madhab Barua – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nevill, Rogers , Barrow, Messrs, T.L. Wilson and Co., Messrs, Dube, De Gruyther , W. Garth

Lord Parmoor:-

The appellant's father Nanda Kumar Barua, was the owner of one moiety and his uncles, the respondent and Chandi Charan Barua, were the owners of the other moiety of a lakhraj estate in the district of Goalpara comprising a large tract of forest land. In or about the year 1894 Nanda Kumar Barua entered into an agreement with the respondent under which the respondent was appointed agent for the purpose of collecting rents and profits from the forest land, in order gradually to pay off a heavy debt, rendering accounts of his management, from time to time, to Nanda Kumar Barua. Nanda Kumar Barua died in July 1899. He left three sons, the appellants, two of whom were minors. For about two years after the death of the appellants' father, the respondent managed the property on the same terms as before. The agency was terminated by a notice, dated 16th January, 1902. In September 1904 the appellants commenced a suit against the respondent claiming a declaration that the respondent was liable, to render accounts to the plaintiffs of the amount realised in respect of the said property for the whole period of the agency. The Subordinate Judge ordered an account of the income an







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top