SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(SC) 10

Adwaitya Prasad and others – Appellant
Versus
Baldeo Dass and another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Douglas Grant, T.L. Wilson and Co., B. Dube, De Gruyther , A.M. Dunne

Viscount Haldane:-

Raghunath Prasad, a Hindu mahajan and dealer in money in the City of Benares, died on the 11th February 1896, leaving property, partly ancestral but mainly acquired, of the value of over three lakhs of rupees. He was about 50 years of age at the date of his death. He had married three times, and his third wife and a daughter by her survived him. He had no son by any of the three wives. Until the end he appears to have been hopeful that a son might be born to him who would perform for him the posthumous ceremonies which the Hindu religion enjoins. Nearly seven years after his death, his widow by deed adopted to him a boy of about five years old. The only question left in this appeal is whether the dead man gave her authority to make the adoption. It is a question of fact, and the answer depends on what reliance ought to be placed on the testimony of certain witnesses.

On the 25th November, 1895, Raghunath Prasad executed a will. Before referring to its terms, which are material in estimating the probabilities on the question of the authority to adopt, it is necessary to state what were the relations of the testator to other members of his family. He had three brothe








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top