SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1917 Supreme(SC) 13

In the matter of part cargo ex steamship "Belgia". – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Lord Parker of Waddington :-

Their Lordships need not trouble the respondent. It appeals that in both these cases the question is really whether the learned President was wrong when he came to the conclusion that the appellants in neither case had proved that the mail from America had not arrived at Frankfort in ordinary course of post. As a general rule the Court will assume, unless the contrary is proved, that letters which are proved to have been mailed do arrive in ordinary course of post, and it is on those who dispute that inference to show the contrary. In both cases the appellants could, had they so desired, have obtained the information direct from Germany. The existence of the war creates no material difficulty in the communication between America and Germany. In both cases they failed to get the information. They tried to induce the learned President to draw the inference that the mail had not arrived from certain very unsatisfactory affidavits as to facts that were put in evidence. Now, when the learned President has decided against them, they ask for leave to put in evidence, which they might have procured in the first instance. Their Lordships have already refused to


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top