1917 Supreme(SC) 27
Privy Council
Bart, Sir Walter Phillimore, Parmoor, Sumner, Parker of Waddington, Justice Lords Buckmaster, JJ.
Municipal Corporation of the Township of Cornwall -Appellant
Versus
Ottawaand New York Railway Company and others, Respondents and The Attorney-General for the Province of Ontario, Intervener -Resopndent
Privy Council Appeal No. 102 of 1916
Decided On : 01-05-1917
For municipal taxation exemptions, "railway lands" refers to land in the lawful actual use and occupation of the railway company, regardless of legal title. Structures affixed to such land and used exclusively for railway purposes are exempt from assessment.
Headnote:(A) Assessment Act - Sections 2, 5, 46 and 47 - Municipal taxation of railway bridge - Definition of "land" and "real property" - Assessment of steam railways - Exemption of structures on railway lands used exclusively for railway purposes - Whether a bridge affixed to land in lawful use and occupation of a railway company constitutes a structure on "railway lands" - The term "railway lands" does not refer to the title by which lands are held but to the lawful actual use and occupation of the person or company on whom a rate is sought to be levied.
(B) Assessment of railway property - Section 47(1) - Roadway land is assessed at average land value excluding structures - Property on public land is assessed differently - Real property in actual use not otherwise designated is assessed at cash value - However, sub-section (3) provides an overriding exemption for structures, sub-structures, and super-structures on railway lands used exclusively for railway purposes.
Facts of the case:
A municipality sought to assess a railway bridge for municipal taxation for the portion situated within its boundary. The bridge consisted of spans supported by abutments and piers located on land and within water channels. The railway company claimed exemption under the statutory provisions relating to the assessment of steam railways.
Findings of Court:
The bridge is used exclusively for railway purposes and is affixed to land in the lawful use and occupation of the railway company. Therefore, it is a structure on railway lands within the meaning of the exempting provision.
Issues: Whether a railway bridge, situated within a municipal boundary, is assessable to municipal taxation or falls under the statutory exemption for structures on railway lands used exclusively for railway purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that "railway lands" for the purpose of taxation exemptions refers to land in the lawful actual use and occupation of the company, regardless of the title by which the land is held. Since the bridge was a lawful structure affixed to land in the company's lawful occupation, it qualified as a structure on railway lands and was thus exempt from assessment.
Result: Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Category Hierarchy
-
taxation
-
municipal taxation
-
railway assessment
- exemptions
-
railway assessment
-
municipal taxation
Lord Parmoor :-
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada confirming a judgment of the Supreme Court of Ontario. Special leave to appeal was granted by His Majesty in Council on the 18th August, 1916, the appellants undertaking not to raise on appeal the question that the Railway and Municipal Board of Ontario had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal direct from the Court of Revision or that the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario, or the Supreme Court of Canada had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeals to these Courts. The question which was left open for the appellants to raise is, whether a railway bridge, which is described in the assessment as an international bridge between Canada and the United States of America, is assessable to municipal taxation, so far as it is situated within the Canadian boundary. The respondents raised in their case the further question whether the appeal is competent, having regard to a prohibition contained in a Provincial Statute, but their Lordships are of opinion that the Provincial Statute does not affect the jurisdiction of the Privy Council to entertain an appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada.
The northern portion of the bridge crosses the north channel of the St. Lawrence by a cantilever span, and is supported on two abutments and six piers. The abutments are on the land to the north of the Cornwall Canal and on Cornwall Island; two of the piers are erected in the canal, one on the strip of land between the canal and the north channel of the St. Lawrence, two in the north channel, and one on Cornwall Island. The southern portion of the bridge crosses the south channel of the St. Lawrence. It rests upon two abutments, one on Cornwall Island, and one on land within the territory of the United States, and upon four piers, one erected on the island, and the other three south of the international boundary. No question arises on details or on cost of construction, and the position of the bridge is sufficiently shown on a map attached to the case of the appellants.
The Assessment Act (R. S. O. Stat., 1914, c. 195) contains the provisions on which the appellants and respondents respectively rely in support of their contentions. Section 2 of the Act defines "land" "real property" and "real estate"" as including, inter alia, all structures erected or placed upon, in, over, under, or affixed to land and all structures erected or placed upon, in over, under, or affixed to any highway or other public communication or water but not the rolling stock of any rail way electric railway, tramway, or street railway. The distinction between structures placed over or affixed to land and structures placed over or affixed to any highway, canal, or, other public communication or water, becomes important in considering the assessment of railways under section 47 of the Act. Subject to certain exemptions, which are not material to the present case, section 5 of the Act renders all real property in Ontario liable to taxation. The structure of the bridge would therefore apart from the special provisions as to railways of the Act, appear to be liable to assessment. Where an international bridge is liable to assessment the method of valuation is specified in section 46.
Section 47 is the section under which steam railways are assessed to municipal taxation, and the present appeal depends on the construction of this section. It enacts that every steam railway company shall annually transmit to the clerk of every municipality in which any part of the roadway or other real property of the company is situate a statement under four heads. These four heads designate what property of a steam railway is liable to assessment. This statement is communicated to the assessor, who is directed to make the assessment on the prescribed basis. There is a third sub-section which exempts from assessment certain structures and other property on railway lands and used exclusively for railway purp