Privy Council
Ameer Ali, Sir John Edge , Phillimore, Atkinson , Justice Lords Buckmaster, JJ.
Rao Kishore Singh -Appellant
Versus
Gahenabai and another -Resopndent
Decided On : 29-07-1919
Custom - Inheritance - Primogeniture - Ekrarnama - Zemindari rights - Family estate - Succession - Hindu Law
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, Rao Kishore Singh, claimed entitlement to a certain estate as the sole heir of his second cousin, Rao Himmat Singh, based on a special family custom of primogeniture. The respondents, widows of Rao Ram Singh, claimed entitlement under ordinary Hindu Law. The case involved the examination of evidence, including genealogical tables and historical reports, to determine the existence and applicability of the custom of primogeniture in the family.
Finding of the Court:
The District Judge found that the custom of primogeniture prevailed in the family, excluding females from inheritance and allowing the male relative in the eldest line of male descent to succeed. The court also analyzed historical reports to establish the origin and applicability of the custom. The court ultimately held that the appellant was entitled to possession of the properties in suit, except for certain items.
Issues: The issues included the existence and details of the custom of primogeniture, the effect of a partition on the appellant's claim, the validity of an Ekrarnama, and the appellant's entitlement as the heir of Rao Himmat Singh.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the custom of primogeniture, excluding females from inheritance and regulating succession based on male descent, prevailed in the family and governed the succession to the family estate. The court also emphasized the importance of historical evidence and the applicability of the custom despite changes in circumstances.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, reversing the decision of the Appellate Court and restoring the decision of the District Judge, thereby granting the appellant entitlement to the properties in suit.
Lord Atkinson :-
This is an appeal from the decision of the Judicial Commissioner of the Central Provinces on appeal from the District Court of Nimar reversing a judgment of the latter Court in an action in which the present appellant was plaintiff and the present respondents were defendants. The fact that the respondents have not appeared on the hearing of the appeal before this Board, requires that the evidence, and the points raised in the case should be examined by their Lordships in more detail than would have been necessary, had counsel for both the appellant and the respondents appeared and presented their respective contentions to them.
The action out of which the appeal has arisen was brought by the appellant, Rao Kishore Singh, to have it declared that he, as sole heir of his second cousin, Rao Himmat Singh, who died on 16th October, 1906, was entitled to a certain estate, particulars of which are set out in detail in the schedules attached to the plaint, of which his said cousin was owner in possession at the date of his death, and also to recover possession of the same. The appellant claims this heirship by virtue of a special family custom upon which he relies, according to which, as he avers (1) females are wholly excluded from inheritance; (2) on the death of a proprietor the whole estate passes to a single person, subject to the liability to maintain the other members of the proprietor's family; (3) on the death of a proprietor the male relative who is in the eldest line of male descent from him succeeds, and in default, the male relative in the eldest line of male descent, from his father, and next from his grandfather succeeds and so on. No restraint on alienation is imposed in other respects by this custom.
The respondents are the mother and stepmother of Himmat Singh, widows of his late father, Rao Ram Singh, claiming to be entitled as the latter's heirs to the aforesaid estate under the ordinary Hindu Law. They admittedly would be so if the alleged custom did not govern the descent of the estate. The genealogical table of the appellant's family for the last six generations, which is set out in the plaint, is admitted to be correct and runs thus :- The Letter "L" appears under the names of those persons still alive who are not parties to these proceedings.
It is in the plaint averred amongst other things and subsequently found by the District Judge that certain properties of which the appellant was then in actual possession were by a certain instrument in writing dated the 21st January, 1841, obtained by his grandfather, Shere Singh, from Rao Partab Singh, the then head of the family, in lieu of the yearly sum of Rs. 210, formerly received by him for maintenance. This document is Exhibit P. 42. From the extraordinary and, as it appears to their Lordships, misleading use made of it by the Appellate Court, it becomes necessary to examine its terms in detail. It is further averred that, with certain trifling exceptions, named by the District Judge, the whole family estate in the schedule to the plaint described descended from Rao Durjan Singh to Rao Barjor Singh, from him to Rao Mohan Singh, thence to Rao Chatar Singh, and from him to Rao Partab Singh and thence to Rao Daolat Singh, all of whom are named in the above-mentioned genealogical table.
It is also averred and not disputed that Rao Daolat Singh died on the 23rd August, 1880, possessed of the whole of the said family estates, leaving him surviving his two widows, Mst. Godawaribai and Mst. Sonabai, and one daughter, Mst. Rajkuwarbai, who is still alive.
It is further averred that Rao Ram Singh, who was a younger brother of Rao Daolat Singh, lived separate from the latter, receiving certain sums of money for his maintenance; that on the death of Rao Daolat Singh, in the events which had happened, the family estates passed by inheritance to Rao Ram Singh, who gave by registered deed to the widows of his brother, Daolat Singh, for their maintenance one village,
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.