SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1919 Supreme(SC) 29

Raja Braja Sundar Deb – Appellant
Versus
Bhola Nath and another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.L. Wilson and Co., Nevill, Barrow Rogers , K. Brown, E. Richards, B. Dube, K.C. , DeGruyther

Viscount Haldane:-

Their Lordships entertain no doubt that the judgment, on the appeal in this suit, of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in favour of the plaintiffs, who are the respondents before the Judicial Committee, was right.

The suit was brought against the appellant, who is Raja of Aul, to recover the price of goods sold and delivered. The first plaintiff, Bhola Nath, was the dealer who supplied the goods, and the second plaintiff, Wahid Ali, was his agent in the transaction in question, and was the person to whom certain promissory notes were given. The claim was for Rs. 14,152-13-0 and interest. The appellant Raja succeeded to the Raj on the 21st March, 1905. The General manager of his estate, from a date just after his succession down to March, 1900, when the Raja dismissed him, was Prasanna Kumar Sen. A person who is still more important for the purposes of this appeal was Shankar Nath, who was "Kote'' manager until his dismissal in December 1909, with authority from the Raja, independently of the General Manager, to purchase and pay for all things required for the use of the Raja himself and his household. About this there is on the evidence no room for questio




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top