SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1919 Supreme(SC) 45

Privy Council
Scott Dickson, Shaw , Dunedin, Lords Buckmaster, Justice Viscount Haldane, JJ.
Mary Board -Appellant
Versus
William Board -Resopndent
Privy Council Appeal No. 87 of 1918
Decided On : 03-07-1919

Viscount Haldane:-

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, by which it was held that there was jurisdiction in the Court to entertain proceedings on a petition for divorce on the ground of adultery.

The Province was established in 1905 by a Dominion Act of that year, being formed out of the North-West Territories. By Section 16 of the Act it was provided that the laws previously in force in the North-West Territories included in the New Province should continue subject to certain reservations which are not material. No law relating to marriage or divorce has been enacted by the Dominion Parliament since the Province was established, and it is therefore necessary to ascertain what was the law relating to marriage and divorce in the Territories before the Province was constituted.

In the appeal, immediately previous to this one, of Walker v. Walker, their Lordships have referred to the legislation by which the Parliament of the Dominion acquired power to make laws relating to the North-West Territories. In 1886, the Dominion Parliament passed, under the powers it had so acquired, an Act to amend the law respecting them (49 Vict., c. 25). By Section 2 of that Act, all its statutes which were not inapplicable were to be in force in the Territories, and by Section 3 of the laws of England relating to civil and criminal matters, as the same existed on the 15th July, 1870, were to be in force in the Territories, in so far as the same were applicable, unless excluded by Imperial or Dominion statute, or by ordinance of the Lieut, Governor in Council.

For the reasons given in their judgment in Walker v. Walker their Lordships are of opinion that the effect of the Act of 1886 was to make the English law of divorce as established by the Divorce Act of 1857, apply to the Territories as well as to Alberta.

But there is another question which has been raised in this appeal, which is whether the Supreme Court of the Province of Alberta has been so constituted as to have jurisdiction in matrimonial Causes, including divorce.

The Dominion Act of 1886, by Section 4, established in the Territories a Supreme Court of record of original and appellate jurisdiction, called the Supreme Court of the North-West Territories. By Section 14, this Court was, for the administration of the laws within them, to possess all such powers and authorities as by the law of England are incident to a Superior Court of civil and criminal jurisdiction and was to have and exercise all the rights, incidents and privileges of a Court of record, and all other rights, incidents and privileges, as fully to all intents and purposes as the same were on the 15th July, 1870, used, exercised and enjoyed by any of Her Majesty's Superior Courts of Common Law, or by the Court of Chancery, or by the Court of Probate in England, and was to hold pleas in all, and all manner of actions causes and suits, as well criminal and civil, real and personal and mixed, and was to proceed in such actions, causes and suits by such process and course as are provided by law, and as should tend with justice and despatch to determine the same, and should hear and determine all issues of law, and should hear and (with or without a jury as provided by law) determine all issues of fact that might be found, and give judgment and award execution, in as full and ample a manner as might at the date mentioned be done in Her Majesty's Courts of Queen's Bench, Common Bench, or, in matters which regarded the Queen's Revenue (including the condition of contraband and smuggled goods), by the Court of Exchequer, or by the Court of Chancery or the Court of Probate in England.

It will be observed that in the above enumeration of Courts the Court of Divorce and Matrimonial Causes, established by the English Divorce Act of 1857, is not mentioned.

By Section 91 of the British North America Act, 1867, the subjects of marriage and divorce are among the matters as to which the Dominion Parliament has exclu















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top