SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1921 Supreme(SC) 26

Rai Bahadur Seth Nemichand, since deceased (now represented by Seth Teekam Chand) – Appellant
Versus
Seth Radha Kishen (since deceased) and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nevill, Rogers , Messrs. Barrow, B. Dube

Lord Dunedin :-

This is suit upon a mortgage. The mortgage was of date the 12th December 1890, for Rs. 30,000, with interest at 10 annas per cent, per mensem, executed by three persons carrying on business as bankers in favour of the Plaintiff. On the back of the mortgage deed there are certain endorsations signed by the debtor, who was the manager of the firm. These show that upto the 11th August 1893, there had been paid Rs. 11,334-6-6. This was accordingly, as also shown, credited to the extent of Rs. 4,652-6-6 to interest being the total amount of interest due as at that date, the balance of Rs. 6,682 being credited to principal, thus reducing the principal due as at that date to Rs. 23,318. After that there are successive credits to interest only at the 14th April 1896, the 17th January 1902, and the 12th August 1904, the payments which each of these credits represents being admittedly less than the amount of interest due at the respective dates.

The present suit was raised on the 12th December 1906 for payment of the balance outstanding. Two of the Defendants contested liability, but this was decided against them, and there is now no question of liability. The only question be








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top