SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(SC) 38

Medai Dalavoi Thirumalaiyappa Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
Nainar Tevan and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Douglas Grant, John Joscelyn, Kenworthy Brown, Dunne, DeGruyther

Sir John Edge :-

This is an appeal by the plaintiff in the suit against a decree, dated the 9th December, 1914, of the High Court at Madras, which reversed a decree, dated the 22nd April, 1912, of the Subordinate Judge of Tinnevelly and dismissed the suit. The parties to the suit are Hindus, and the suit is for a declaration to protect the interests of the plaintiff as a reversioner in certain immoveable property which was sold for Rs. 5,300 on the 22nd November, 1897, by the defendant 1 to the defendants 3 and 4.

The defendants 1 and 2 are the widows of one Medai Dalavoi Shanmuga Kumaraswami Mudaliyar (hereafter referred to as Shunmuga), who died childless in 1892. Shanmuga was a separated Hindu, and at the time of his death was possessed of a considerable estate, which was more or less encumbered. That estate included a one-third share in the village Aiyanarkulam. That village will be hereafter referred to as the Mouza.

On the death of Shanmuga the defendants 1 and 2 succeeded to his estate as Hindu widows. After the defendants 1 and 2 had succeeded to the estate they divided the estate or part of it between them, and thereafter each of them enjoyed separately those parts of the est



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top