SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(SC) 12

Naba Kumar Das and others – Appellant
Versus
Rudra Narayan Jana and another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
W. W. Box and Co., Shephard, Walkar, Chapman, A. M. Dunne Ramsay, De Gruyther Bogram

Viscount Haldane:-

In this litigation the High Court at Fort William, as the Court of Appeal, reversed a judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Third Court, 24 Parganahs. The appel lants had brought a suit in the latter Court for a declaration that a forfeiture by the Government of a certain lease and agreement was invalid and that they, as plaintiffs, were entitled to possession of the land, the subject of the lease.

The learned Subordinate Judge de cided in favour of the plaintiffs, but the High Court allowed an appeal from his decision and dismissed the suit. The present appeal is brought by the plaintiffs, and it seeks to have the decision of the learned Judge of first instance restored.

The only question now relevant for de termination is whether the resumption by the Government in 1906 of Crown land in the Sunderbans, originally leased on the 7th December, 1900, and a subsequent pottah by the Government, dated the 27th July, 1909, in favour of the respondent, Rudra Narayan Jana, were validly made.

The only material facts are not numer ous. A lot called Monsadwip in Saugor Island, Sunderbans, was put up to auction by the Government for settlement, and the highest bidder was






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top