Privy Council
Ameer Ali, Sir John Edge, Blanesburgh , Justice Shaw, JJ.
Ma Sa Bon and others -Appellant
Versus
Ma Da Twe and others -Resopndent
Privy Council Appeal. No. 108 of 1923
Decided On : 29-07-1924
reconveyance - properties - 9th of December, 1918 - The main question in the case was the true effect of the executed deeds on the 9th of December, 1918, which raised the vital question of possession of the properties. The controversy between the appellants and the first respondent depended upon the true effect of these executed deeds, and the court's decision was based on the interpretation of the deeds and the rights of the parties involved.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants sought reconveyance of properties in their favor by the respondents. The properties were heavily indebted and subject to mortgage decrees and attachments by creditors. Various arrangements and transactions were made to settle the debts and transfer the properties, leading to a dispute over possession and reconveyance.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the first respondent was not entitled to independent possession of the properties and that there was no default on the part of the appellants disentitling them to a decree for specific performance of their agreement for repurchase. The court also held that the first respondent and her husband were responsible for the litigation.
Issues: The main issue was the entitlement to reconveyance and possession of the properties, as well as the interpretation of the executed deeds and the conduct of the parties involved.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the executed deeds, the rights of the parties involved, and the absence of default on the part of the appellants disentitling them to a decree for specific performance.
Final Decision: The appellants were entitled to a decree for specific performance and to have the properties reconveyed to them by all the respondents on compliance with the terms imposed by the deeds. The court provided a detailed order for the execution of reconveyance and allocation of costs.
Lord Blanesburgh :-
The question upon this appeal is whether the appellants are entitled, and, if so, on what terms, to have a reconveyance of the properties in suit executed in their favour by the respondents.
The District Court of Akyab by a decree dated the 15th of January, 1920 held that the appellants, the plaintiffs in the suit, were so entitled on the terms prescribed by the decree. The Chief Court of Lower Burma on appeal reversed that decision and dismissed the suit. The plaintiffs appeal.
They are the legal representatives or successors in interest of one Mi Po Ma (who died in March, 1917) and of one Shwe Zan U (who died in October, 1918). Mi Po Ma and Shwe Zan U were the owners of the properties in suits. They each of them died heavily indebted. Amongst their creditors were the Bank of Bengal and the second defendant Maung Tha Nyo. He died while the appeal in the suit to the Chief Court was pending, and his estate is represented before the Board by the respondents 2 (A) to 2 (K). Their Lordships will continue to refer to him and his estate as the second defendant.
On Shwe Zan U's death the Bank and the second defendant took steps to enforce their claims against the estates of their deceased debtors. The Bank obtained a mortgage decree over the properties in suit for upwards of Rs. 88,000; the second defendant obtained before judgment an attachment for an amount, not stated, upon certain of the properties. Obviously some arrangement was necessary if the interests of the appellants in the properties were not to be sacrificed. Two friends of the deceased came forward to avert this misfortune. One of these was Do Aung Gyaw, the husband of the first respondent, and at the time the cashier at Akyab of the Bank of Bengal. The other was U Tha Do Pyu, a retired Superintendent of Land Records.
These two intermediaries first of all set themselves to make terms with the Bank of Bengal, and they succeeded at length in getting the Bank to accept Rs. 45,000 in satisfaction of its entire debt. Later, an arrangement was concluded with the second defendant that he would accept Rs. 10,500 in full satisfaction of his claims.
But the raising of the necessary moneys proved to be a source of difficulty owing to the apparent desire both of the second defendant and of Do Aung Gyaw to acquire or retain some personal interest in the properties.
At the outset Tha Do Pyu took the leading part in the arrangements, and his first proposal was that the second defendant should buy the properties in suit direct from the appellants for a price at least sufficient to discharge both the Bank's adjusted debt and his own. This proposal, however, fell through. It suited neither the appellants, nor Do Aung Gyaw. The next suggestion was that one Mra Tha, a friend of Tha Do Pyu, should buy the properties for Rs. 50,000, on the terms that although conveyed to him they should remain in possession of the appellants, who were to be entitled to buy them back within three years for Rs. 50,000, with a commission of Rs. 3,600 "for profits or kindness," and deeds were actually prepared to carry out that transaction.
At the last moment, however, Mra Tha withdrew from the negotiation, at the instance, it is suggested, of the second defendant, whose desire to have an interest in the properties was not under that proposal realized. The final arrangement was one under which Mra Tha's place, at the instance, as their Lordships cannot doubt, of her husband Do Aung Gyaw, was taken by the first respondent Ma Da Twe. The deeds as originally prepared with Mra Tha's name inserted were utilized, interlineations and alterations being made in them as they now appear in the actual engrossments. In that form they were at length axecuted.
The main question - indeed, the only question - as between the appellants and Ma Da Twe, the first respondent depends upon the true effect of these executed deeds to which she became party, and it will be convenient to refer to them at once, although their Lo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.