(Maung) Kyi Oh and another – Appellant
Versus
Ma Thet Pon – Respondent
Viscount Dunedin. -
The land, the contention as to which is the matter of this suit, belonged originally to one U Laik, who died somewhere about the year 1893. He left the land burdened with a mortgage. U Laik was survived by a large family ; to most of the family there is no reason that any particular reference should be made, but the youngest daughter married U Bauk. That lady died and U Bank married again. The lady had before her death a daughter called Ma Thet Pon, and Ma. Thet Pon is the plaintiff in the present suit. After her death and his second marriage U Bauk had certain children, and one of them and her husband are the administrators of U Bauk's estate and are the first two defendants in the present suit. In the year 1909 there was brought a redemption suit to redeem the lands from the mortgage with which they had been encumbered by D Laik during his life. What happened in that redemption suit was that the money which was paid into the Court to effect the redemption was paid in by the hand of U Bauk. The decree for redemption decreed the land in the name of the heirs of U. Laik, but there is a controversy as to whether U Bauk immediately entered into possession or whethe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.