SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(SC) 4

(Maung) Kyi Oh and another – Appellant
Versus
Ma Thet Pon – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bramall and Bramal, Sanderson Lee and Co., Prince Fateh Singh, Gerard S. Sanders, E.B. Raikes

Viscount Dunedin. -

The land, the contention as to which is the matter of this suit, belonged originally to one U Laik, who died somewhere about the year 1893. He left the land burdened with a mortgage. U Laik was survived by a large family ; to most of the family there is no reason that any particular reference should be made, but the youngest daughter married U Bauk. That lady died and U Bank married again. The lady had before her death a daughter called Ma Thet Pon, and Ma. Thet Pon is the plaintiff in the present suit. After her death and his second marriage U Bauk had certain children, and one of them and her husband are the administrators of U Bauk's estate and are the first two defendants in the present suit. In the year 1909 there was brought a redemption suit to redeem the lands from the mortgage with which they had been encumbered by D Laik during his life. What happened in that redemption suit was that the money which was paid into the Court to effect the redemption was paid in by the hand of U Bauk. The decree for redemption decreed the land in the name of the heirs of U. Laik, but there is a controversy as to whether U Bauk immediately entered into possession or whethe






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top