SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(SC) 58

V. E. A. R. M. Firm and another – Appellant
Versus
Maung Ba Kyin and another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bramall and Bramall, E.B. Raikes, A.M. Dunne

Viscount Dunedin. -

In September 1920, one Po Hla, who was proprietor of certain real property, executed a mort gage of that property in favour of Upe for Rs. 10,000. At the same time, he also executed a promissory note in fav our of Upe for Rs. 5,000, and what has been said in the judgments below may be anticipated by saying that it has been found that these transactions were quite genuine transactions and represented a mortgage and a promissory note executed for a real debt. Now time went on and inasmuch as interest had not been paid, when it comes to the critical date with which we shall have presently to do, the state of affairs was this : that these Es. 10,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively had with interest grown into a sum of Rupees 17,000, of which, of course, only part was under the mortgage and the other was merely an ordinary debt.

Now in 1922, Po Hla executed a deed of sale to Maung Ba Kyin and Ma Sein. Ba Kyin was the son of Upe, his creditor, and Ma Sein was his own daughter. It is quite evident that the idea of this transaction was that Upe, in respect that it was his own son, was willing that his debt of Rs. 17,000 should be taken as part consideration of the price to be




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top