SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(SC) 3

Rameshwar Singh and another – Appellant
Versus
Bajit Lal Pathak and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hy. S. L. Polak, Pugh and Co., W. Wallach, K. Brown, A.M. Dunne

Lord Blanesburgh. -

The question at issue in this suit is as to the ownership of some 44 bighas 8 kathas of agricultural land lying within the ambit of the mauza of Bele Pomo in the zemindari of the Maharajah of Darbangha. The lands constitute the bulk of a single well-defined block of three jotes having a total area described throughout the proceeding as of 59 bighas and 8 kathas. The remaining 15 bighas 4 kathas occupy a central position in the block, being surrounded by the 44 bighas. The whole area has been claimed by Bajit Lal Pathak, the first respondent. But it is his claim to the 44 bighas which is alone in question in this suit. His claim to the 15 bighas has been dealt with in a separate suit to which, with its result, reference will later on be made.

The history of the lands is voluminous but as it has been detailed with much care and precision in the judgments below, it need not be again elaborated here. The plaintiff's case - and by the term "plaintiff" their Lordships when they use it will refer to respondent 1, who in all proceedings has been the real contestant on one side, just as when they use the term defendant" they will refer to appellant 1, the Maharajah of Dar











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top