SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(SC) 44

Bhai Panna Singh and others – Appellant
Versus
Bhai Arjun Singh and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Langlois Harding and Tate, Hy. S. L. Polak, J. Nissim, L.De Gruyther, B. Dube, A.M. Dunne

Lord Atkin.:-

This is an appeal from the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, North-West Frontier Province at Peshawar. The dispute arises out of an agreement for the sale of a serai in Peshawar. There were cross suits, vendors and purchasers, each alleging that the others bad broken the contract and claiming damages. The vendors succeeded before the Subordinate Judge, the purchasers before the Judicial Commissioner. The vendors appeal. In 1924 the vendors were the owners of the serai in question upon which there were mortgages amounting to Rs. 80,000 in favour of one of the former owners. They were being pressed by their creditors and found it desirable to sell the property. The sale was negotiated by brokers and the agreement was dated 19th February 1924. The agreement provided for the sale to the purchasers for Rs. 1,05,000. Cost of stamp paper and registration was to be borne equally. The purchasers were to pay Rs. 500 earnest money.

"The party retracting from the contract shall pay Rs. 10,000 as pashemana (damages)."

Vendors-purchasers were each to pay one per cent brokerage. No time was fixed for completion but on the same day the purchasers paid the earnest money and were given




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top