SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1930 Supreme(SC) 11

(Morris) Leventhal and others – Appellant
Versus
David Jones Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
W.G. Earen, H.P. MacMillan , M. Dare, Wilfred Barton , W.A. Greene

Lord Merrivale.-

This appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of New South Wales raises questions as to the construction of a series of documents exchanged between lessors and lessees of business premises in George Street, Sydney, with the intention of ascertaining precisely their respective liabilities for the taxes payable in respect of the premises. The dispute between the parties has given rise to conflicting judicial opinions, expressed in a suit in equity instituted by the lessees and an ejectment action brought by the lessors, in each of which the lessors obtained judgment, and in an appeal of the lessees to the Supreme Court of New South Wales where the lessees were successful. The lessors are appellants against the judgment of the Supreme Court.

The lease of the premises, dated 30th November 1909, but sealed by the respondents pursuant to a resolution of the Board passed on 1st March 1910, demises the premises for 33 years from 1st August 1909. Among the lessees' covenants in the following:

"And also will bear, pay and discharge all rates, taxes, charges and assessments and all outgoings whatsoever whether Parliamentary, municipal, local or otherwise which now or hereafte










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top