SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1930 Supreme(SC) 63

Senaji Kapurchand and others – Appellant
Versus
Pannaji Devichand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
W. Wallach, K.V.L. Narasimham

Kumaraswami Sastri, Offg. C.J.-

This is an appeal against the decree of the Subordinate Judge in a suit for dissolution of partnership and the taking of partnership accounts. The plaint states that the partnership was formed between four firms which were unregistered. They were four unregistered firms which according to the plaint entered into one partnership in respect of certain bales of yarn. It is alleged that business was carried on and profits accrued and the prayer is that an account be taken of the profits due to the plaintiffs and given to them.

When the appeal was taken up it was found that the total number of persons constituting the four firms which entered into this partnership to deal as a combined concern with these goods consisted of 22 persons and the question arose as to how far on the plaint such a partnership would be legal having regard to S. 4, Cl. (2), Companies Act, which states that:

"No Company, Association or Partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be formed for the purpose of carrying on any other business that has for its object the acquisition of gain by the Company, Association or Partnership or by the individual members thereof, unless










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top