SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1931 Supreme(SC) 77

Privy Council At Canada
Lord Macmillan, Killowen , Lord Russell , Lord Atkin, Viscount Dunedin, Justice Lord Chancellor, JJ.
Attorney-General of Canada -Appellant
Versus
Attorney-General of Ontario and others -Resopndent
Privy Council Appeal No. 38 of 1931
Decided On : 22-10-1931

Advocates Appeared:
Redden, Blake , Charles Russel

The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the Parliament of Canada has broad legislative authority, including the power to regulate and control matters of national interest and importance, such as aerial navigation, under S.132 of the British North America Act, 1867.

Headnote:

Aeronautics - Jurisdictional Conflict between Dominion and Provinces - British North America Act, 1867 - S.91, S.92, S.132 - Air Board Act, Aeronautics Act - Regulation and Control of Aerial Navigation - Convention relating to the Regulation of Aerial Navigation - Legislative Authority of Parliament of Canada - Validity of Aeronautics Act and Air Regulations

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a jurisdictional conflict between the Dominion and the Provinces of Canada regarding the regulation and control of aeronautics. The Parliament of Canada enacted the Air Board Act, which was consolidated in the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1927, under the title of the Aeronautics Act, to perform obligations under a Convention relating to the regulation of aerial navigation. The Supreme Court of Canada held that while the Dominion had jurisdiction under various heads of S.91, there was also a local field of jurisdiction for the Provinces.

Finding of the Court:

The Supreme Court of Canada answered the questions posed in the negative or with qualifications, expressing difficulty in answering abstract questions. The Privy Council, however, found that the Dominion Parliament had legislative authority to pass the Aeronautics Act and authorize the Regulations, and that the questions should be answered in the affirmative.

Issues: The issues involved the exclusive legislative and executive authority of the Parliament of Canada for performing obligations under the Convention, the necessity of legislation for the regulation and control of aeronautics within Canada, the legislative authority of the Parliament of Canada to enact the provisions of S. 4, Aeronautics Act, and the authority to sanction the making and enforcement of the Air Regulations, 1920.

Ratio Decidendi: The Privy Council emphasized the broad powers conferred by S.132 of the British North America Act, 1867, giving the Parliament and Government of Canada all powers necessary or proper for performing the obligations of Canada under treaties. They also highlighted the national interest and importance of aerial navigation, and the fact that the subject had attained such dimensions as to affect the body politic of the Dominion, justifying the legislative authority of the Parliament of Canada.

Final Decision: The Privy Council advised that the appeal should be allowed, affirming the legislative authority of the Parliament of Canada to pass the Aeronautics Act and authorize the Regulations.

The Lord Chancellor.-

This appeal raises an important question as between the Dominion and the Provinces of Canada regarding the right to control and regulate aeronautics, including the granting of certificates to persons to act as pilots, the inspection and licensing of aircraft, and the inspection and licensing of aerodromes and air-stations. The question is whether the subject is one on which the Dominion Parliament is alone competent to legislate, or whether it is in each Province so related to provincial property and civil rights and local matters as to exclude the Dominion from any (or from more than a very limited) jurisdiction in respect of it.

The Supreme Court of Canada has decided the question in its several branches adversely to the claims of the Dominion, and has held in effect that while the Dominion has a considerable field of jurisdiction in the matter under various heads of S.91, British North America Act, 1867, there is also a local field of jurisdiction for the Provinces, and that the Dominion jurisdiction does not extend so far as to permit it to deal with the subject in the broad way in which it has attempted to deal with it in the legislation under consideration.

During the sittings of the Peace Conference in Paris at the close of the European War, a Convention relating to the regulation of aerial navigation, dated 13th October 1919, was drawn up by a Commission constituted by the Supreme Council of the Peace Conference. That Convention was signed by the representatives of the Allied and Associated Powers, including Canada, and was ratified by His Majesty on behalf of the British Empire on 1st June 1922. It is now in force between the British Empire and seventeen other States.

With a view to performing her obligations as part of the British Empire under this Convention, which was then in course of preparation, the Parliament of Canada enacted the Air Board Act, Chap.11, Statutes of Canada, 1919 (1st Session), which, with an amendment thereto, was consolidated in the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1927, under the title of the Aeronautics Act, Ch. 3. It is to be noted however that the Act does not by reason of its reproduction in the Revised Statutes take effect as a new law. The Governor-General in Council, on 31st December 1919, pursuant to the Air Board Act, issued detailed "Air Regulations" which, with certain amendments, are now in force. By the National Defence Act, 1922, the Minister of National Defence thereafter exercised the duties and functions of the Air Board.

By these Statutes and the Air Regulations, and the amendments thereto, provision is made for the regulation and control in a general and comprehensive way of aerial navigation in Canada, and over the territorial waters thereof. In particular, S. 4, Aeronautics Act, purports to give the Minister of National Defence a general power to regulate and control, subject to approval by the Governor in Council (with statutory force and under the sanction of penalties on summary conviction), aerial navigation over Canada and her territorial waters including power to regulate the licensing of pilots, aircraft, aerodromes, and commercial services; the conditions under which aircraft may be used for goods, mails and passengers, or their carriage over any part of Canada; the prohibition (absolute or conditional) of flying over prescribed areas, aerial routes, and provision for safe and proper flying.

Their Lordships were told during the course of the argument that no Provincial Legislature had passed any such legislation, but that this had not prevented the progress of aeronautical development in the Provinces. It appears, for example, that in Ontario there has been established subject to these regulations one of the most complete survey services in the Empire, and that it is working most harmoniously. Their Lordships are not aware that any practical difficulty has arisen in consequence of the general control of flying being in the hands of the Dominion, but at







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top