SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(SC) 92

Manmohan Das – Appellant
Versus
United Provinces and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.L. Polak and Co., R.K. Handoo, J.M. Tucker , P.V. Subba Row, C.S. Rewcastle

Sir John Beaumont.-

These consolidated appeals are from a decree of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, dated 22nd August 1941, and from an earlier decree of a Division Bench of that Court, dated 30th April 1940, both decrees being made in the winding-up of the Lower Ganges and Jumna Electricity Distributing Co., Ltd., (hereinafter called the company).

2. The question which calls for decision is whether certain mortgage debentures issued by the company for the purpose of securing a sum of Rs. 3 lacs with interest, and secured by a debenture trust deed, constitute a valid charge on the undertaking and assets of the company, or whether the charge upon the undertaking intended to be created in favour of the debenture holders is void by reason of the provisions of S. 9, sub-Ss. (2) and (3), Electricity Act IX [9] of 1910 (hereinafter called the Act). These sub-sections are in the following terms :

"9. (2) The licensee shall not at any time assign his licence or transfer his undertaking, or any part thereof, by sale, mortgage, lease, exchange or otherwise without the previous consent in writing of the Provincial Government.

(3) Any agreement relating to any transa





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top