SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(SC) 19

Bhagwan Das – Appellant
Versus
The King. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
High Commissioner for India, King, White, Lambert, King, Miss Tyabji, B. Sen, L. Saunders

Lord Oaksey.-

Special leave to appeal was granted in this case without their Lordships being acquainted with the necessary documents, which were no doubt not available. Leave was granted limited to the question of whether or not the proceedings were valid having regard to the fact that the appeal was signed and filed in the High Court by the Advocate- General and not by the Public Prosecutor.

[2] The relevant documents have now been produced before their Lordships, and the facts are as follows :

[3] By the Government of India Act, 1935, it was provided by S. 55, that every Province was to have an Advocate-General. On 1st April 1937, the Government of India Act, came into force. On 3rd April 1937, a notification in the Gazette provided that in exercise of the powers conferred on him by S. 492, Criminal P. C. 1898, the Governor of the Punjab is pleased to appoint the Advocate-General of the Punjab to be a Public Prosecutor generally for the Punjab. On 5th April 1937, two days later, Mr. Ram Lall was appointed Advocate-General. On 9th February 1938, he was appointed a Judge. On 11th February 1938, Mr. Sleem, the officer who filed the appeal to the High Court in these proceedings, was app








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top