SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1947 Supreme(SC) 45

Rani Munia and another – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Bikram Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nevill, Rogers, Barrow, T.L. Wilson and Co., S. Hyam, Thomas Strangman, S.P. Khambatta, C.S. Rewcastle

Lord Uthwatt. -

This is an appeal from a judgment and decree of the Chief Court of Oudh at Lucknow dated 15th October 1943, which partly reversed and partly affirmed a judgment and decree of the Civil Judge of Malihabad, Lucknow, dated 9th April 1941.

2. The appeal arises out of proceedings brought by the appellants in which they claimed inter alia possession of three villages, Mohammadpur Saraiyan, Jam Khanwan and Agasar. The title to these three villages is now the only matter in dispute. The rights of the parties depend upon the true construction of a deed of family settlement dated 4th October 1923, the appellants contending that under it Bhagwan Bakhsh Singh was either entitled to these villages absolutely or was entitled to dispose of them by will, and the respondent contending that he had no such interest or power.

3 The Civil Judge held that Bhagwan Bakhsh Singh was absolutely entitled to the villages. The Chief Court held that he was entitled to a life interest only and had no power of disposition by will.

4 The question at issue arises in the following circumstances. The three villages in question form part of the taluqdari estate of Itaunja in the District of Lucknow. In the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top