Sir John Beaumont. -

This is an appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dated 31 - 8 - 1939, affirming a judgment and decree of the District Judge, Dharwar, dated 5 - 8 - 1937.

[2] The appeal arises out of a suit filed by the respondent and three others under S. 92, Civil P. C., for a declaration that a certain institution known as Shri Sidha Arndha Swami Math was a public trust of a religious or charitable nature, for the framing of a scheme in connection with the institution, and for the removal of the appellant from his position as the head of the institution on the ground that he is unfit to occupy that position, and for consequential relief. The Shri Sidha Arudha Swami Math would be more accurately described as a Temple than as a Math, but it has been referred to as a Math throughout the proceedings, and will in this judgment be called "the Math."

[3] The facts relating the the foundation of the Math and the acquisition of the properties belonging thereto are not in dispute. The appellant at Ex, 194 accepted as correct the statements contained in the first fourteen paragraphs of the deposition of plaintiff 4 which contained a full history of the matter. The contention of the appellant is that the Courts in India have drawn wrong inferences from the facts.

[4] The learned trial Judge discussed in detail and with much care the documentary and oral evidence, particularly In relation to the circumstances in which the various properties used in connection with the Math had been acquired. In appeal the High Court again discussed the evidence in considerable detail, and both Courts reached the conclusions that the institution, whether it be called a Math or a Temple, was founded by the public for a public, charitable and religious purpose, viz., the worship of the Swami during his lifetime and of his Samadhi (tomb) after his death, and for the purpose of the various festivals which bad been, started in connection with the institution, and that the offerings made to the Swami, the properties purchased out of those offerings and those acquired by gifts after 1912 (when the Swami assumed control of the Math), must all be regarded as accretions to the original foundation, and that all the properties in suit form part of a trust created for purposes of a charitable or religious nature. Counsel for the appellant has referred their Lordships to all the relevant evidence and no useful purpose would be served by a further discussion of it in detail. Their Lordships can state shortly and in general terms their reasons for agreeing with the conclusions of the Courts in India.

[5] The Swami came first to Hubli about the year 1877 as a mendicant, possessing no property. In the course of time he began to give discourses on the shastras and claimed to be an incarnation of the God Mahadeo, and as such to be worthy of worship. He collected a large body of disciples and before his death property of very substantial value had been acquired for the purposes of the Math. The Swami himself took no interest in material matters, being concerned mainly with the religious side of the activities of the Math, and it is on the face of it improbable that members of the public would have given property of substantial value to the Swami for his own personal use. The evidence shows that in some cases lands were acquired by panchas at Hubli, in other cases lands or ornaments were given direct to the Swami or on his behalf to to Sbiddappa, the father of the appellant, who had been appointed Mukhtya to the Swami about the year 1920. The buildings on the land used for the purposes of the Math were erected out of offerings made to the Swami. No disputes in connection with the Math seem to have arisen until the year 1924 when the Swami made a will, giving the whole Of his property to the appellant. The property comprised in the will included the movable and immovable properties used or held in connection with the Math and the right of