SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(SC) 54

Joseph Darmanin for the firm C. Darmanin and Son – Appellant
Versus
Carmel Micallef for the firm F. Micallef and Son – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hy. S.L. Polak and Co., Thomas Cooper and Co., C.J. Colombos, P. Devlin

Lord Thankerton.-

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal, Malta, dated 9th December 1938, which upheld, by a majority, the judgment of His Majesty's Commercial Court of Malta, dated 31st May 1938, which dismissed the present appellant's action. The appellant, on behalf of the firm C. Darmanin and Son, raised the present action in the Commercial Court, Malta, on 19th February 1938, against the respondent on his own behalf and for his firm, claiming to be entitled to a half share in the profits derived by the respondent from a contract awarded to them by the Royal Engineers on 27th August 1937 for work to be done at Mosta Fort, in the Malta Command. The appellant based his claim on a written agreement dated 18th November 1936, which provided as follows:

"By virtue of this present instrument intended to have all legal effects it is hereby agreed as follows :

Joseph Darmanin for the firm of C. Darmanin and Son of the one part and Carmel Micallef for firm G. Micallef and Son of the other part confirm the negotiations already in force since sometime between them for the excavation of stone and construction thereof by means of machineries. Wherefore, the parties hereto on t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top