SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(SC) 44

Warren Ducane Smith – Appellant
Versus
The King – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.L. Bryden, Kenelm Preedy, John Fennell, L.M. Minty

Lord Atkin:-

In this case the appellant was tried before the Chief Justice and the Assistant Justice of Bermuda and a special jury on an indictment charging him with the murder of two children on 22nd November 1933. The trial took two or three days. The jury on the last day of the trial were unable to coma to an agreement, and were absent about three hours. They announced to the Chief Justice, who was presiding at the trial, that they were still disagreed. Then they were, by the Chief Justice, sent back for consideration for the night to their hotel, where they were staying during the trial. According to the shorthand note of the proceedings, the next day at 10.15 the Court opened. The Registrar said : "Gentlemen, have you agreed on your verdict ?" (Foreman of Jury) : " No Sir." (The Chief Justice):

"Gentlemen, I am obliged to you. I am sorry you have not agreed on your verdict, but you will be discharged now and you will be exempted from service on a jury for the next two years."

It seems to follow from that that the trial was at an end and the jury were discharged. Then the foreman of the jury rose from his seat. (The Chief Justice) : "Do you wish to say anything ?" (Foreman of Jury




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top